Email
Print
Save
September 2, 2012 (KHARTOUM) – Sudanese security authorities on Sunday confiscated editions of three daily newspapers after they were printed and without giving their editors any reasons.
- Sudanese journalists hold slogans which reads in Arabic ’Press freedom or no press’ as they protest against the suspension of AL-Tayyar daily newspaper at Sudanese Journalists Union’s office in the capital Khartoum on July 17, 2012 (GETTY)
Sudan officially ceased direct press censorship in 2009 but continues to suspend and confiscate newspapers as a way of retaliation if they report on a long list of issues considered sensitive. Newspapers also complain that they continue to receive phone instructions, usually via text messages from the National Intelligence and Security Services (NISS), ordering them not to report on certain issues.
The three papers confiscated on Sunday are the privately owned Al-Sahafah, Al-Jarida and the pro-government Akhir Lahzah.
- Front page of Al Sahafa, December 11, 2011 (TMCT)
Al-Sahafah’s editor Al-Nur Ahmad Al-Nur told Reuters that agents of the National Intelligence and Security Services (NISS) confiscated the entire print-run of his paper’s Sunday edition after it had been printed and without mentioning any reason.
“We consider the confiscation to be equal to an economic penalty on the newspaper,” he said.
More details came from Al-Sahafah’s managing editor, Hassan Al-Batari, who said that a NISS agent arrived at the paper’s offices after Sunday’s edition was printed and told them he had orders to confiscate the entire print-run without giving any reasons.
He also confirmed that the NISS still practices pre-publication censorship.
“Pre-publication censorship is still practiced sometimes through phone instructions from NISS agents”. He added that sometimes NISS agents visit the paper’s offices before it goes to the printing press and demand removal of reports and articles related to security issues.
- Front page of Al Jareeda, June 12, 2011 (TMCT)
The managing editor of Al-Jarida, Idris Al-Douma, also told Reuters that a security agent went to the printing house after midnight and confiscated their Sunday’s edition. “They confiscated every copy of the paper,” he said.
Sudan Tribune also learned that the pro-government daily Akhir Lahzah has had its Sunday’s edition confiscated by NISS agents after being printed.
Confiscation of printed editions inflicts severe financial damage on the newspapers which are already hard-pressed due to the economic crisis that befell the country since it lost three quarters of its oil production following the secession of South Sudan in July last year.
Three newspapers have been suspended indefinitely since the start of this year. One of them, Al-Ahdath newspaper, later announced it had closed permanently as it had run out of money.
Press repression has increased in Sudan since the secession of South Sudan and the outbreak of new armed conflicts in the country’s border regions of South Kordofan and Blue Nile. Security authorities are focused on newspapers since the broadcast media sector is tightly controlled by the government.
Reporters Without Borders, a media watchdog, currently ranks Sudan as 170th out of the 179 countries in its annual global press freedom index.
(ST)
Latest Comments & Analysis
Africa and the ICC: a dynamic relationship 2013-05-24 09:19:39 By Tiina Intelmann May 23, 2013 - The relationship between Africa and the International Criminal Court (ICC) is remarkable in its history, and dynamic. Africa and the ICC share the fundamental (...)
NCP Parliament Speaker will not negotiate with those who carry arms 2013-05-23 08:09:52 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman May 22, 2013 - This article comes on the backdrop of the war drums beating campaign orchestrated by the National Congress Party (NCP) regime Parliament Speaker, Ahmed (...)
At the Mercy of the Sky, South Sudanese professionals 2013-05-23 08:02:35 By Suzanne Jambo May 22, 2013 - "I have nothing to hide and I walk away with my head high. There was absolutely no board meeting to discuss my issue. The reason given were unilateral spending (...)
MORE