Home | News    Tuesday 9 October 2012

Sudan prefers political agreement over Abyei

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

October 8, 2012 (KHARTOUM) — A spokesperson for Sudan’s Foreign Ministry on Monday indicated that Sudan would prefer for a political agreement to be reached with South Sudan over the disputed area of Abyei, stressing that a referendum might bring war between the two sides.

JPEG - 26.5 kb
People displaced by fighting in Abyei wait for assistance and aid supplies in the village of Agok May 18, 2008. (Reuters/file)

Al-Obeid Ahmed Marawah, told reporters in Khartoum on Monday that many proposals were discussed during negotiations brokered by the African Union held recently in Addis Ababa.

He added that Juba supported the organisation of a referendum while Khartoum called for a political solution over the disputed region. The two parties disagree over who among the Misseriya pastoralists can take part in the vote over the fate of Abyei.

"How what the results were, the referendum would end by attributing Abyei to one of the two countries. And this will not satisfy the other party," he said. "Therefore, this could cause a new conflict between the two people of Abyei and it might extend to be between the two countries."

"This is why we do not prefer the referendum option. But the political solution will satisfy all the people of Abyei from both sides and lays the foundations for a permanent peace between them. And (The Abyei areas ) would be a bridge between the two countries," he added.

The African Union chief mediator Thabo Mbeki, at the end of the talks, sent a proposal, without informing the two negotiating teams of its content, to presidents Omer Al-Bashir and Salva Kiir suggesting to hold a referendum in October 2013.

Sudan rejected Mbeki’s proposal saying it was not in line with the protocol the two parties agreed in 2005 saying the proposition does not provide for ’permanent’ abode or residence as a condition for voting in the referendum.

Sudanese officials denied, during the weekend, statements attributed to the Sudanese president saying he supports the partition of Abyei between the two countries.

The two sides are expected to resume talks on Abyei issue and other disputed areas on the border between the two countries.

Mbeki is also expected to report to the AU Peace and Security Council and the UN Security Council over the agreements the two countries reached on 27 September and the remaining issues.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 9 October 2012 09:56, by Paulkedit

    Absolutely the Land of Dinka Ngok can’t and will never be share with the so called Baggara.

    repondre message

    • 9 October 2012 15:26, by Hardball

      Referendum of Abyei means people from Abyei choice to choose where they belong; not someone else making the choice for them. What’s Khartoum afraid of? Do they think Abyei people are not going to vote to be part of Sudan? That’s what referendum mean, the freedom to choose.

      repondre message

      • 9 October 2012 15:48, by zulu

        The NCP is deeply engaged in a web of deception that will haunt it down to its doom. In Kiswahili, they say, "dawa ya moto ni moto" Means put off fire with fire. there is time, where some of these folks will live the lifestyle of the palastenians

        repondre message

  • 9 October 2012 10:29, by Mr Point

    But ... Khartoum has broken every "political" agreement ever made on Abyei.
    What chance is there that any new "political" agreement, made against the interests of the permanent residents of Abyei, would ever last?

    repondre message

  • 9 October 2012 10:43, by Mapuor

    People who make comments here should know that Abiei was not taken by force,it was decision of Abiei people to go to Kordufan.Now who do you people want to die for Abiei?Nuer of Gatjak,Gaguong,Ciengnyajane are Ethiopians,what is wrong with Dinka Ngok being Sudanese?

    repondre message

    • 9 October 2012 13:55, by Mr Point

      People who make comments here should allow the choice of the permanent residents of Abyei to determine where Abyei should permanently reside.
      A referendum now, for the permanent residents to express their rights, would settle the matter conclusively.

      repondre message

    • 9 October 2012 14:01, by $hambe

      Mapuor.
      Ngok Dinka must unite and and choose their destiny.this time we South Sudanese want nine Ngok chiefdom to recruit 10,000 youth to liberate themselves from the oppressors in Khartoum.
      it seems as if Dinka Ngok have divided equally, those want to remain in North and those who want to join their brothers in the South Sudan.Who will die in that land while youth of that place are subdivided?

      repondre message

      • 10 October 2012 02:13, by Nguetbuny de Luelpiny

        Shambe
        Ngok are not just 9 section of Abiei only, there are Ruweeng, Ngok of UpperNile and Padang is the same group of Ngok Family. Abiei is just left behind section of Jieng; they need a convention to fight Misseriya & Rizeigat at one. All south tribes must fight against settlement of in their Land. Sudanese African ingenious must unit to liberate their territories from settlement programme.

        repondre message

    • 9 October 2012 15:46, by Hardball

      Mapour, you’re missing the point here badly, no one is forcing people of Abyei to go either way, and this is why referendum is propose by African Union to the people of Abyei to choose to be either part of Sudan’s Kordufan or chooses to be South-Sudan’s Unity State, Warrap or NBG State and not you making any choice for them.

      repondre message

    • 9 October 2012 17:28, by Rommel

      Mapuor:
      This is one of the biggest problems I have with this ’forum’ — the tendency for people to so quickly offer a position that is in direct conflict with the documented historical facts — an uninformed opinion informed entirely by ignorance... and unfortunately you’re guilty of this.

      repondre message

      • 9 October 2012 17:32, by Rommel

        Contrary to what seems to be a widely held belief on here, Deng Majok had no hand in the transfer of Abyei from Bahr el Ghazal to Kordofan in 1905. Abyei was *transferred* to Kordofan by the *Condominium Government*, and not by any of the leaders of Abyei when Arop Biong (the father of Deng Majok) was Paramount chief.

        repondre message

        • 9 October 2012 17:35, by Rommel

          Deng Majok only succeeded his father in 1943. Prior to the exit of the British from Sudan, Deng Majok was afforded the choice to either rejoin Bahr el Ghazal or remain in Kordofan... and needless to say he disastrously chose Kordofan over Bahr el Ghazal in 1951, without the approval and/or support of his people.

          repondre message

          • 9 October 2012 18:13, by Ruach

            Romel(Biong):And how come people the land was tranferred to SK while 90% refused to join that region?Did he force them?

            repondre message

            • 9 October 2012 18:56, by Rommel

              Ruach:
              You have to understand that the arrangement (s) of the colonial power wasn’t exactly based on ’democratic’ ideals that extolled anything akin to representation or anything that echoed Abraham Lincoln’s famous proclamation of a "government of the people, by the people, for the people". It was vicegerent - based on delegated power in the hands of a select, unaccountable few.

              repondre message

              • 9 October 2012 19:16, by Rommel

                Another thing that you have to take into consideration is the fact that Deng Majok was part of a dynasty that has ruled the Jok-Ngok since the 16th Century with the rule of Jok Atur Kuk ... and so they might not have been all that inclined to rebel, for stability sake if nothing else. This family has exercised far too much power over these people for far too long. PS: I am from Twic-east.

                repondre message

                • 9 October 2012 20:10, by sudani ana

                  Hi Rommel
                  I must tell you that I feel inclined to agree with Mohamed Ali’s assertion that you and Luka Biong are in fact the same person. You are never far away when ever Abyei is mentioned. No other subject seems to interest you enough to post a comment. And what’s behind the name Rommel? Are you a big fan of the Nazi war general or what?

                  repondre message

                  • 9 October 2012 21:05, by Rommel

                    Not you too! Really, you too!? LOL It seems that I’ve got you all so very terribly paranoid. I regard every inch of my inheritance as sacrosanct. I write just as frequently and just as incisively on the fate of other occupied territories — areas like Kafia Kingi and Aliiny ("Heglig")... if there’s an article pertaining to these areas.

                    repondre message

                    • 9 October 2012 21:32, by Rommel

                      Abyei just so happens to be the most prominent of all the disputed areas, for which articles pertaining to it are abundant. The Kafia Kingi enclave is slightly larger than Abyei but it doesn’t seem to inspire, stir or evoke anywhere near the passion, the palpable anger and the profanity laced vitriol that has become such a feature of this site.

                      repondre message

                      • 9 October 2012 21:47, by Rommel

                        Abyei seems to occupy a unique position and is regarded and approached altogether very differently from other contested areas, which is unfortunate because it invariably belittles the importance of other occupied territories. I chose this pseudonym because I come from a military family, and I might just have an unhealthy interest in mechanized warfare...

                        repondre message

                        • 9 October 2012 22:10, by Rommel

                          ..the same kind of warfare that Erwin Rommel so excelled in. Did you know that American marines & soldiers in the first Gulf war ordained the interior of their M1 Abrams tanks with his picture? This is the level of respect that the man continues to inspire and command even to this day.

                          repondre message

                          • 9 October 2012 22:18, by Rommel

                            I have been reading books on wars, weapons and Generals ever since I was fourteen [14] years of age. I am now twenty two [22] — and I read everything from economics, history, politics, science and technology... because I am preparing myself for the political arena.

                            repondre message

  • 9 October 2012 11:20, by hellonearth

    PEOPLE OF ABYEI PLEASE DON’T BE LIED TO. REMEMBER WHY THE PEOPLE OF SOUTH SUDAN DECIDED TO BE A COUNRTY OF THEIR OWN. DON’T ALLOW ANYONE TO MAKE DECISIONS FOR YOUR FUTURE. DON’T LET THE FAKE ARABS MAKE DECISIONS THAT WILL MAKE YOU FORTH CLASS CITIZENS. BELIEVE

    repondre message

  • 9 October 2012 12:04, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    One wonders what political resolution of Abyei dictated by Khartoum means? And what is referendum termed with regard to Abyei matter? I thought Referendum on the future status of Abyei is a grand political, democratic way of solving the issue. And the people involved should be the permanent citizens of the land called Abyei as stipulated in Abyei protocol of 2005. Please stop confusing people!

    repondre message

  • 9 October 2012 12:25, by Foxtail

    AAAAAAAAH, Crack your mind guys but listen, I agreed that people of Abyei chose to be part of South kordofan back in 1906. guys,during the 1947 all parties confernce that was meant to determine the future for both SOUTH and Sudan, politicians from across South Sudan chose to remained part of the bigger Sudan which had just splited a year ago, who is to blame for that fault?

    repondre message

  • 9 October 2012 15:17, by Edward Marshall

    Well if sudan prefers political agreement over Abyei(Adinka Ngok land).South sudan have right to prefers political agreement over sudan as general by meter.My dear s sudanese.This is acold war,many agreement has been made since 1972 Addis ababa.Up to now our leaders are still singning many threat to our side.First mistake is alesson.Let NO be NO!.Junubin Your YES,YES,YES!is killing Us.

    repondre message

  • 9 October 2012 15:59, by Frank Man

    Al-Obeid and the Bashir are compitent of their skill in manipulative negotiations and they also know well the weakneses of our nigotiating team and how they can easly be manipulated. Even a fool can deduce something from this statements. Kirr & Amum must be strong this time to demand the rights of the Ngok Dinka Or they should allow stronger men like Dr.Luka Biong to lead our team in Adis.

    repondre message

  • 9 October 2012 20:59, by ViVa Sudan

    ABIYE IS OURS NOT FOR SALE WE MESIRYA READY TO DIE FOR IT SO KEEP UR MOUTHSHOT SOUTHNERS FAKE PPL & IF THEY WANT TO BE IN SUDAN THEY ARE WELCOME BUT NOT U SICK INSECTS.

    repondre message

    • 10 October 2012 02:21, by Nguetbuny de Luelpiny

      Viva
      Ngok are not just 9 section of Abiei,there are Ruweeng, Ngok of Upper Nile,Padang they are the same group of Ngok Family. Abiei is just left behind section of Jieng; Jieng need a convention to fight Misseriya & Rizeigat. All south tribes must fight settlement of invaders into their Land. All African ingenious must unit to liberate sudan out from Arab settlement programme. Liberation is still

      repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


On Abyei enough is enough 2013-06-18 05:01:47 By Deng Vanang June 17, 2013 - No one whether locally or internationally can still argue there is more hope to resolve Abyei stalemate peacefully. It has been everybody’s wish that dialogue could (...)

The arming of rebels in Sudan and South Sudan: what is the evidence? 2013-06-18 04:57:44 By Eric Reeves 17 June 2013 - News reporting in general, a great deal of analytic writing, and virtually all diplomatic pronouncements about military support for rebel groups—in South Sudan and (...)

Bashir’s decision, a material breach of the oil agreement 2013-06-16 06:21:14 By Justice Deng Biong June 15, 2013 - After its ratification by the National legislatures in both South Sudan and Sudan States, the Cooperation Agreement [CA] (Oil Agreement included) signed on (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Nuer Youth and Prophet Ngundeng’s Historical Society call for unity in South Sudan 2013-06-14 05:40:43 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Leadership of Nuer Youth and Ngundeng’s Historical Society, Juba, South Sudan June 12, 2013 - Due to the announcement made by President Bashir to abrogate the September, (...)

South Sudanese lawyers call for the respect of the rule of law and human rights 2013-06-14 01:01:36 South Sudan Law Society (SSLS) 7 June 2013 Lawyers in the Republic of South Sudan call for advocacy for the supremacy of the respect of the rule of Law, Human Rights in South Sudan South Sudan (...)

South Sudan civil society alliance ask to meet the president 2013-06-12 05:23:59 South Sudan Civil Society Alliance National Issues Discussed with the Presidential Legal Advisor and Appeal to meet the President June 7, 2013 Ladies and gentlemen of the press, today the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.