Home | News    Tuesday 23 October 2012

S. Sudan hopeful of AU endorsement of mediation proposal on Abyei

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

October 22, 2012 (JUBA/KHARTOUM) - South Sudan on Monday expressed “strong optimism” about the possibility of the African Union Peace and Security Council (AUPSC) coming together to “unanimously” endorse a peace proposal aiming at addressing a long standing dispute over the border region of Abyei.

JPEG - 15 kb
Luka Biong Deng, a co-chair of Abyei Joint Oversight Committee (Getty)

“There is strong consensus building up around the proposal. The level of consensus is high. The whole world is keenly following the process. Everybody is waiting for the mediation panel to present their report to African Union peace and Security Council," Luka Biong Deng, a leading member of South Sudan’s governing Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) said on Monday.

Deng spoke to Sudan Tribune after his arrival to the Ethiopia capital, Addis Ababa, from South Africa where he and accompanying government officials held bilateral discussions with officials from South Africa’s government and leadership of the country’s ruling party on Sunday.

The co-chair of Abyei Joint Oversight Committee (AJOC) will participate in a ministerial meeting of the African Union Peace and Security Council where the issue of Abyei will be discussed and a possible resolution is expected to be endorsed on Wednesday 24 October before being refered to the UN Security Council.

At the height of conflict between South Sudan and her neighbouring Sudan in April, AUPSC unanimously issued a strongly-worded communiqué, demanding the two sides to pull out their troops from Abyei and other disputed areas notably Heglig.

The prime objective of the communiqué was to ease hostilities from flash point areas and urge the parties to the conflict to immediately resume negotiations without preconditions. These demands were later adopted by the security council of the UN and passed a resolution number 2046 demanding also the two countries to pull their armed forces out of contested areas and to resume completed negotiations on all outstanding issues with three months.

In the event that the two sides failed to reach an agreement, the African Union High Implementation Panel (AUHIP) would make a recommendation to be approved by the African Union Peace and Security Council as a final and binding decision on both sides.

Conscious of the threat to their economies, both Sudan and South Sudan decided to resume discussions in Addis Ababa in June, under facilitation by the AUHIP, resulting in the signing of nine agreements in September.

The agreements, which were received with mixed reactions particularly by border communities in the South, were ratified by the two houses, paving the way for the resumption of negotiations the remaining outside issues. While deal allows the South to resume oil production and export it to the international markets through Sudan, the two sides could not agree the mediation’s proposal on Abyei and the status of other contested areas.

South Sudan President Salva Kiir and his negotiating team accepted the proposal but Sudanese President Bashir and his negotiating team rejected it. Sudan expressed its support to a previous proposition the mediation had made in November 2010 calling to partitioning the region between the two countries but Juba rejected it.

Deng said the government of South Sudan and its negotiating team accepted the mediator’s proposal because it derives its basis from the 2005 peace accord, which provides the people of Abyei, through a specific protocol, the right to decide their fate at a referendum and come in line with the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration on the area.

The South Sudanese official, explained that the new nation expects the African Union to not only to endorse the proposal but to come up with measures to ensure the parties accept and immediately implement the outcome of the proposal.

“Of course there are concerns about commitment of the (Sudanese) government to honouring agreements but if Khartoum tries this time to reject again the endorsed proposal, as it done in the past, the AU should review the membership of Sudan in AU and its protection from the ICC [International Criminal Court]. The AU should explore other economic and political sanctions that should isolate Sudan,” he said.

“The government of the Republic of South Sudan as a member of the AU should review its bilateral relations with Sudan including the recently signed Cooperation Agreement. The South should review its payment of $3.028 billion to Sudan as Transition Financial Assistance, joint campaign for debt relief, mobilization of international community to assist Sudan and lifting of economic sanctions,” Deng stressed.

The official further stated members of the UN Security Council are expected to unanimously endorse the AU endorsed proposal on the final status of Abyei.

“But if Bashir attempts to reject it the UN endorsed proposal on Abyei, the UN Security Council should equally take more severe sanctions on Sudan, particularly economic and political sanctions. The international community should stand together to apprehend Bashir and hand him over to ICC. The UN Security Council in collaboration with AU to explore a possibility of ensuring the conduct of Abyei Referendum in 2013 even without the consent of Sudan”, he explained.

Recently US Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice said Resolution 2046 was adopted thanks to the united position of the Security Council.

Khartoum, which is aware of Rice’s support to the South Sudanese position over Abyei has sought to convince Moscow to support the partition of Abyei saying it can bring a lasting peace between the two communities of the disputed area.

In Khartoum, following a meeting with Vice-President Al-Haj Adam Youssef with the co-chair of the Abyei Joint Oversight Committee (AJOC) Al-Khair Al-Fahim, told reporters in Khartoum that they support the position of President Omer Al-Bashir which rejects the AU proposal on Abyei referendum.

Al-Fahim who was accompanied by a delegation of Messeyria tribal leaders launched a call for peaceful coexistence between the nomads and the Ngok Dinka, but he did not speak about the message they delivered to the Sudanese presidency.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 23 October 2012 07:41, by Diu J.Kuek

    Dr Luka Biong please Abyei case is need a hard work and International mobilization its so complicated case your father Deng Kuol Majok whatever was been name done very big error in the human history he might been thought as was making a better future for you guys in Abyei but now turn to be a disaster so you living as IDP in your own land he lefted with unreadable legacy.

    repondre message

    • 23 October 2012 07:56, by Diu J.Kuek

      Anyway we wishes you for the best of luck to succeed in Abyei issue but if not working out you another alternative can be a part of Warrap State but as far as I know my people of Bahr el Ghazal they will treats you as second class in Warrap State please Dr Luka do n’t be surprise for this even you can be a pointed as office manager of the Governor Nyadeng Malek,

      repondre message

      • 23 October 2012 08:07, by Hardball

        There is no historic evident that Abyei belong to Sudan; whether be it the inhabitants of the region of which are 100% Dinka people. The argument by Sudan over Abyei ownership is nothing more than just a “straw man argument”. We understand; it’s so painful for Sudan that South Sudan separate; but that doesn’t justify Sudanese holding tied to something that doesn’t belong to them.

        repondre message

        • 23 October 2012 09:09, by Jalaby

          Hardball,
          "it’s so painful for Sudan that South Sudan separate" who told you that?wake up man,it’s over now my friend,north running after the south has become part of history and majority of northern people want Jonobean to go home!We got the oil back that we missed and you will buy all our goods in hard currency this time,let us see who will cry soon!

          repondre message

          • 23 October 2012 09:44, by Hardball

            Jalaby,
            You want South Sudanese to go home! South Sudan had it independent almost a year and half ago. You haven’t let South Sudanese go because you’re still hoping there will be a reunite Sudan which will never happened in a million years. Just let South Sudanese go; there will be no stupid four-freedoms!

            repondre message

            • 23 October 2012 18:56, by Northern Sudanese

              Hardball
              HAHAHAHAH LMAO , please where do you get this from? since when did we northerns want to reunite? since when did we prevent southerners from going south? southerners are begging to stay in north because of the shit thats going on down there! we want you out by all means looooooool LMFAO ’’You haven’t let South Sudanese go’’ hahahahah please, what do we want from them? they got nothing!

              repondre message

              • 23 October 2012 23:37, by Hardball

                N. Sudanese
                Then why don’t you let them go? Who is asking you to let them stay in Khartoum? You just want to keep Southerners in Khartoum to solicit oil in South Sudan which you’ll never have.

                repondre message

                • 13 November 2012 00:16, by Northern Sudanese

                  Hardball
                  hahahaha your so funny dude, ’’ oil in South Sudan which you’ll never have’’ keep dreaming, your leaders are giving us 30% of your oil for free + $3 bilion compensation for attacking Heglig which we kicked your butts out from in 10 days.

                  repondre message

            • 23 October 2012 19:02, by Northern Sudanese

              Hardcrap
              we don’t want any 4 shits, its a threat to our internal security in our towns. you are known for theft, breaking rules and killing people for cows. Please don’t make a fool out of yourself, no northerner wants to re unite. You are nothing to us, the only thing we have in common is trade, nothing else. your existence isn’t vital at all, if your here or not its no difference. don’t come!

              repondre message

              • 24 October 2012 00:01, by Hardball

                N. Sudanese
                If we are nothing to you; how could we be anything to you in trade? Here is news flash; we can’t and will not trade with clowns!

                repondre message

                • 13 November 2012 00:13, by Northern Sudanese

                  Hardball
                  late reply
                  Damn didn’t see this response, haahhaa clowns? we? no lol the real clowns are those who can’t read or right like south sudanese, 80% of south sudanese can’t read or write.
                  Hardcrap, you have no choice, if you don’t trade you will be fucked. without our food southerners will die loool, and without our pipes your economy is 98% fucked!

                  repondre message

          • 23 October 2012 15:14, by Makunon

            Southerners rise before you think and wait a minute you will soon be slave in South Sudan.

            repondre message

      • 23 October 2012 08:32, by Diu J.Kuek

        Dinka Dominated SPLA/M you are saying you will not insult any body today yet making your comment to generalize Nuer community as whole, anyway for the Abyei case as we the South Sudanese we can fight for this land as we can but when all of us are so keens for the national interests as our unity and solidarity to protects our nation this when there is no conspiracy against the other communities.

        repondre message

  • 23 October 2012 07:44, by wang

    Too late to make a U-turn, Abyei is a part of North for real.

    repondre message

    • 23 October 2012 07:58, by Dinka Dominated SPLA/M

      What is wrong with Nuer people? If you don’t want to help in bring our land back from hostage, than just stop talking about it because the person who is not going to help can just shut up.
      I don’t want to insult nobody today, so for us to live in peace, than stop provoking the situation please,

      repondre message

    • 23 October 2012 22:05, by panom lualbil

      Although you stabbed us from behind, we must win. You love MUSLIM to WIN becos they enslaved you, but they wont win. Abyei belong to DINKA NGOK and it couldNOT be sold like GUMBALLA by president NIMEERI.

      repondre message

  • 23 October 2012 08:00, by Jalaby

    Rommel (Dr. Luka),
    Bribing south Africa to support your solution and narrow view will never help Dr. Luka, once again, I’m telling you,any solution that will overstep Misserya right is useless and basket garbage is his only place!
    Your solution that you’re trying to market is rot and no one willing to buy a rot stuff sir!

    repondre message

    • 23 October 2012 08:20, by Nibs

      "Overstep messirays’ rights",my foot!why did u sign cpa which clearly overstep that thing u call right?let’s wait for tomorrow and your nonsenses will cease.talking of garbage!you guys said nasty things about impossibility of south separation thus,we are suprise by your language.

      repondre message

      • 23 October 2012 19:13, by Northern Sudanese

        Nibs
        You sound like a crying whore, why was separation of shitty south impossible? why would we want your reeking smell? the only thing we wanted was your black gold before it runs out, now we are getting it anyway :)

        repondre message

    • 23 October 2012 08:22, by Chol

      Jalaby, bribing people is not a business we practice in South Sudan. Just because you do it in Sudan doesn’t means everyone else does it! The issue of Abyei is very simple; an open and shut case; all you need to do is ask the natives of the land where they belong and they will tell you point blank that they are South Sudanese and that’s it. No follow up question.

      repondre message

      • 23 October 2012 19:16, by Northern Sudanese

        Chol
        Since when did Abyei belong to south? yes the people living there belong to south but they are not its natives, they just occupied it since it was empty. the land originally belongs to north but the people who lived in it belong to south!
        Its not a simple case, otherwise there wasn’t any need for negotiations!

        repondre message

  • 23 October 2012 10:12, by Tutbol

    Guys like Luka Biong and other senior officials in our govt have trusted the international community such that the UN is like our uncle, even tne knowlegeable like Luka just keeps trusting these organisations when they have seen all along that these agencies have their own vested than they’re really after S Sudanese best interests and this is worrying, regarding our senior leadership.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)

The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.