Home | News    Wednesday 31 October 2012

NCP wants no disagreements over “Islamic” foundation of next constitution – official

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

October 30, 2012 (KHARTOUM) – An official with Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party (NCP) warned opposition parties on Tuesday against objecting to an Islamic foundation for the country’s next constitution.

JPEG - 24.3 kb
A Sudanese woman stands in front of an electoral poster for Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party (The Guardian Website)

Speaking to reporters in the capital Khartoum, NCP leading member and minister of investment Mustafa Osman Ismail said that the Islamic current is the dominant one among Sudanese people and therefore should form the basis of the next constitution. “We don’t want any disagreement over that” he said.

Ismail comments reflect the growing polarization in the country over the issue of the constitution that should replace the current transitional one which was installed in 2005 following the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) with the mainly Christian South Sudan.

As South Sudan hurtled towards its independence, which took place in July last year under the CPA, a number of NCP officials, including the country’s president Omer Al-Bashir made remarks suggesting that the country should create a new constitution on the basis of Islamic Shariah laws, citing religious homogeneity in the country after the secession of the south.

The main opposition coalition National Consensus Forces (NCF), which comprises the National Umma Party (NUP) of former Prime Minister Al-Sadiq al-Mahdi and the Islamist Popular Congress Party (NCP) of Hassan Al-Turabi among others, rejected an invitation by President Omer Al-Bashir last month to participate in a meeting to discuss the constitution.

NCF allies argue that the current political climate is not suitable for such a critical process, pointing to lack of freedoms, NCP absolute control of state institutions and the ongoing wars in the peripheral regions of Darfur, South Kordofan and Blue Nile.

Opposition parties demand, therefore, that the constitution-making process takes place under a transitional government representing all political parties and armed groups. They also argue that the NCP has no legitimacy to supervise such process citing their boycott of, and alleged fraud in, the 2010 general elections which the ruling party won.

The NCP official stressed the importance that opposition parties clarify their position on the Islamic premise of the constitution since most people in Sudan favor this premises without risking the rights of religious minorities.

Adding to the controversy surrounding the constitution is the existence of a coalition of Islamist groups, the Islamic Constitution Front (ICF), which is lobbying the government to create a puritan version of an Islamic constitution. The ICF threatened on more than one occasion to mobilize the masses against the government if it fails to create a proper Islamic constitution.

NCF allies did not make a clear stance over the issue of an Islamic constitution but they once accused the NCP of seeking to use Islamist groups to create a constitution that ignores religious and ethnic diversity in the country.

Ismail said that the dialogue with opposition parties over the next constitution will not witness any disagreements over the issues of governance structure and freedoms if the opposition demonstrated enough seriousness to engage in the process.

The NCP official denied opposition’s allegation that his party is trying to single-handedly create a constitution that would consolidate its grip on power. “If we were rushing to do it we would have already proposed a draft constitution and made use of the absence of other parties. But this is not our way” Ismail said.

He added that his party is keen to secure enough consensus around the constitution hence their attempt to include opposition parties. Ismali said that if certain “considerable” parties agreed to join the process of constitution creation, it will start.

The NCP has been trying to bring the NUP to the constitution-making process. On 22 October, NCP member and second Vice-President Al-Haj Adam Youssef held talks with NUP leader Al-Sadiq al-Mahdi at the latter’s house in Omdurman. Youssef expressed hope after the meeting that the NUP would agree to participate in the dialogue over the constitution.

Few days later the NUP announced the formation of a committee under the chairmanship of Al-Mahdi to discuss whether or not to accept NCP invitation to participate in the talks over the constitution.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 31 October 2012 09:46, by Northern Sudanese

    i am not pro south shit or anything, but when do our leaders realize that Islamic ruling is what brought Sudan down? i am not anti islam but why do we ’’have’’ to live under Shariah? yes most sudanese are muslims, but does that mean those who are not have no right? why having wars when we could easily be a democratic state. a muslim goes to his mosque and christian goes to his churge. whats wrong?

    repondre message

    • 31 October 2012 12:13, by Logic

      N. Sudanese
      Who cares what bigots like you think. The reason why political Islam destroyed the country is because of simple retarded minds like yours.
      As long as the SPLM-N exists there will never be a peaceful Islamic state, unless we divide the country yet again.

      repondre message

      • 31 October 2012 17:18, by Northern Sudanese

        Logic
        and who’s gonna listen to an insect’s opinion? you got your shithole, now leave us in our country alone son of a bitch :)

        repondre message

  • 31 October 2012 09:50, by Northern Sudanese

    i can assure you NCP, the majority of Sudanese would have remained happy if we were still a Democratic State. in 1985 we didn’t down Nimeiry because we hated Democracy but because of his economic crisis he created. thats why we need to turn back to a democratic state, we are a nation full of different cultures,religions,tribes and people.

    repondre message

  • 31 October 2012 09:55, by Akol Liai Mager

    Even with no disagreements, a viable Taliban Islamic style regime will never survive in North Sudan. Take examples of the current Tunisian, Libyan and Egyptian governments led by Muslim Clerics (Islamic Movements) and answer this question; are they stable? Even Muhammad’s Caliphs did not have a stable Islamic State and that’s why they were all killed in their struggles for power.

    repondre message

    • 31 October 2012 10:17, by Nibs

      That desert is your own now.you can impose all madness you want. One thing i’m certain,there will be more civil wars.i absolute encourage your stupidity of all sorts.

      repondre message

      • 31 October 2012 17:20, by Northern Sudanese

        Nibs
        thank you for leaving us alone, good luck in your shithole where there is no food,electricity,clean water,doctors,schools,security. i am pretty sure we will hear more cow conflict in your insect nest :)

        repondre message

  • 31 October 2012 11:05, by australian

    Islamic state means it will have to rely on looting to survive. Too many Islamic states in the region mean more refugees for non-Islamic countries so the Islamic states can live on the remittances they send home. Islamic states are good for no-one. The Muslims are unhappy and so are we because we get all the refugees - which we don’t want because they bring Islam and cost us a fortune.

    repondre message

    • 31 October 2012 17:23, by Northern Sudanese

      australian
      really? so your christian country knows law? why did you do for those who stole 4 bilion?lol and what about those who keep killing each other for cows? and those cops that keep killing civilians?
      please, now your speaking about refugees that you push into south? do you know the number of insects in sudan? if you did then you won’t mention refugees :D

      repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


National unity: a project for each and every South Sudanese 2013-05-21 14:23:01 By Jacob K. Lupai May 21, 2013 - South Sudan has just attained independence from an imposed unity that had failed miserably to take into account the objective realities on the ground. In the old (...)

Unity and reconciliation necessary for sustainable peace in Darfur 2013-05-21 14:19:47 By Adeeb Yousif May 20, 2013 -The biggest challenge in the Darfur conflict today is divisions. These divisions have created misunderstanding and mistrust within Darfurian society. Moreover they (...)

The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.