Thursday, August 15, 2024

Sudan Tribune

Plural news and views on Sudan

Darfur remains major issue of concern for Americans – Poll

Feb. 1, 2007 (WASHINGTON) — A new poll shows that Darfur crisis remains a leading issue of concern for a majority of Americans. They even say favorable for a tough action against Khartoum.

“A new poll from the Genocide Intervention Network finds ending genocide is a high foreign policy priority for a majority of Americans.” The rights group said today.

A strong majorities feel that the United States should take action to bring about peace in Darfur, and favor doing so in cooperation with the international community.

The crisis in the Darfur region of Sudan, unanimously declared to be genocide by the US Congress in 2004, has claimed the lives of more than 200,000 civilians and displaced 2.5 million people, according to the United Nations.

The poll was commissioned by the Genocide Intervention Network to determine the priority Americans place on ending the violence in Darfur, and support for specific means of doing so.

Among the 1,018 adults surveyed in the poll last December, nearly two-thirds (62 percent) believe taking action to stop humanitarian crisis like genocide should be a high (42 percent) or the highest (19 percent) foreign policy priority for the country. Among respondents who had heard “a lot” or “some” about Darfur previous to the poll, support climbs further to 71 percent.

The survey also indicates large changes in awareness about the conflict, the result of sustained campaigns, in particular by the Save Darfur Coalition. Over half of Americans — 59 percent — now say they know “a lot” or “some” about the conflict in Darfur, compared to levels reported in 2004, when a similar question commissioned by the Program on International Policy Attitudes found only 14 percent familiar with the conflict.

YES FOR A STRONG INVOLVEMENT

Americans want the United States to get involved to stop the genocide in Darfur:

Nearly two-thirds (62 percent) of Americans support the use of targeted individual sanctions, including asset freezes and travel bans, against Sudanese leaders responsible for planning and executing genocide — even though respondents were told that some of these officials occasionally provide intelligence to the United States on al Qaeda activities.

Fifty-four percent of Americans support denying entry in US ports to oil tankers that have carried Sudanese oil. Provisions for both targeted sanctions and port-entry denial have already been signed into law by the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act, but have not been enforced.

FOR JOINT ACTION WITH INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

Americans want the United States to work with the international community:

Americans support cooperation between the US and the International Criminal Court (ICC) to bring the perpetrators of the Darfur genocide to justice. A majority (53 percent) want the United States to help the ICC, even if there is a chance in the future its prosecutors may some day attempt to charge Americans with war crimes for their operations in Iraq and elsewhere.

FAVORABLE TO MULTILATERAL MILITARY ACTION

Americans support multilateral — but not unilateral — military intervention:

A majority (50 percent) of Americans favor US military intervention in Darfur, so long as it is part of an international peacekeeping force.
Americans are more reluctant to take military action if it is unilateral and potentially dangerous. Nevertheless, a surprisingly large minority (37 percent) support even an aggressive US mission in Darfur that would require 10,000 US troops and a cost potentially exceeding one hundred American lives.

The Genocide Intervention Network and its members advocate not for aggressive military intervention but rather the enforcement of the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act, passed by a bipartisan Congress last year and signed by President Bush.

Important provisions include targeted individual sanctions against “key architects of the genocide” and denial of entry to ships that have carried Sudanese oil — a measure intended to dissuade oil companies from working with Sudan and helping to finance the country’s military spending.

(Genocide Intervention Network)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *