S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
By Julius N. Uma
December 14, 2011 (JUBA) — The newly independent South Sudan risks an
outbreak of internal conflicts, if minority ethnic rights are excluded
from the country’s major decision making process, Minority Rights
Group International (MRG) said in a recent briefing.
The update, entitled “Southern Sudan: The role of minority rights in
building a new nation”, details a series of interviews conducted on
the protection of land and property rights of minority groups and
individuals in the country.
The role of minorities, it says, must be a focal point in the
nation-building process, adding that competition over access to scarce
resources could cause tensions between groups, often leading to an
explosion of violence that undermines development initiatives.
“There is also a danger that ethnic concerns could hijack the
political process even as it develops. This could create a state
dominated by the interests of the most populous ethnic groups at the
expense of smaller ones,” the 12-page briefing partly reads.
The newly independent South Sudan, which comprises of 10 states, is a
home to an estimated 56 ethnic groups and almost 600 sub-groups.
In an interview with Sudan Tribune on Wednesday, Marusca Perazzi,
MRG’s Conflict Prevention Projects Coordinator expressed fear on the
risk of minority people losing not only their cultural identities, but
natural resources as well.
“Minority communities should be allowed to develop their own systems
to enable them protect their rights on land and properties,” Perazzi
said during the launch of the briefing in Juba, the South Sudan
capital.
MRG’s comprehensive update, among others, urges government to ensure
that land leases to private companies are subjected to community
consultations, and that South Sudan’s draft transitional constitution
should be modified to allow for an independent and impartial process
for the appointment of the members of the Land Commission, rather than
appointment by the President, as is currently provided for.
The same process, it further recommends, should apply to bodies
established at county and payam (district) levels under South Sudan
Land Act 2009.
A 2011 baseline survey on large scale land-based investment in South
Sudan shockingly revealed that about 2.64 million ha or 26,400 km2
(larger than the size of Rwanda) has been allocated for foreign
investments in agriculture, bio-fuel and forestry.
The survey carried out by South Sudan Law Society and Generation
Agency for Development and Transformation-Pentagon (GADET-Pentagon)
further noted that about 5.74 million ha or (57,400 km2), an
equivalent of 9% of South Sudan’s total land area have been earmarked
for both domestic and foreign investments.
Companies such as such Al Ain Wildlife, Nile Trading and Development
and Jarch Management, according to the survey, lead the pack of
investors with the biggest land allocations in South Sudan.
(ST)
Sundayw
S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
As long as corrupt land deals are allowed to go on unchecked, there is going to conflict over resources in South Sudan. Some companies such as Jarch intentionally seek out ex-rebels and warlords as partners in securing lands that is owned by poor people who do not have muscles and guns. It is a failure by the government to enact laws governing the acquisition, distribution, and productive use.
BM Bol
S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
Laws are only as good as they are enforced. Land Ownership, Tenure and Natural Resources are clearly spelled out and defined in chapter 2 in The Transitional Constitution of the Republic of South Sudan. The problem is enforcing them. Our people must be taught about the importance of obeying & respecting laws.
Daniel Buolmawei
S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
David Koul Deng, what are talking about here? Your research is biased filled up with emotions and lies gathered from Equatoria, who everyday cry for landgrapping, something not true. Equatorians were rarely seen during the war, and now they make a lot of noise of landgrapping by Dinkas. I am not to be seen as tribalist, but my brothers and sisters in Equatoria really make us sick. Stop crying.
Eastern
S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
During the war as it is now during the SPLM led government, there is no respect for the minority. The current government only seems to be aknowledging citizens drawn from Dinka and Nuer tribes – the rest of the people in South Sudan according to it are foreigners: Ugandans and Kenyans. The minority were considered not to have participated in the liberation struggle. A big lie though!
Daniel Buolmawei
S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
Stop talking about landgrabbing, let’s defend our land first. You David Koul Deng concerns much about landgrabbing, a propaganda lie orchestrated by Equatorians and never think what your great grandfather Deng Koul Arop did when he gave a Anyei to Northern Sudanese. This is the issue (Abyei issue) we want to talk about at the moment. Please help us correct the mistake of your grandfather.
Daniel Buolmawei
S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
Well, Eastern those who participated were a significant small number, not like a majority we have seen now complaining every day. It is not good to claim being a part when things turned right and distancing yourself off when things get ugly. I don’t think you like such-like style habits. We must stand togather as brothers at both good and ugly times. In that regard, respect will reign for all.
Green
S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
It is a representative govt! what representation are you talking about? that what democracy mean, majority is matter in democracy so dont mess up everything! what system do we want to form in s.sudan? cabinets minsters are only representing the ruling party, it is everywhere but, parilament is the only systemt to represent people! why do we have to be naive in everything? lets be wise enough!
Green
S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
@Daniel!
You right!This is how our African ppl betray themselve to UN and others orginizations. This guy is instituting the problem from nowhere, and he will claim the references he made today! People write things out of nowhere!Someone in USA or Europe, will take this into consideration that, minorities are being marginalized on thier land.people constructed the problem, that’ll hunt them!
Green
S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
I’m sick of intellectual people in s.sudan! people write stuff like they live in another country? where is the damn nationalism in your heart! do we have to propagate everything because of money/to get pay! if we dont figure out how the politic of this world work, they will be on shoulder for the rest of our lives on earth! there are issues needed to b spoken to people and issues to be document!
Nguetbuny de Luelpiny
S. Sudan risks conflict over exclusion of minority groups: MRG
The Land Grapping should be later after 20 years. It is temperory stay now due to civil war inflock. when everything is clear after 20yrs. Everyone will be settledown into their main place. Equartorian are like Talkative woman alway. why they did not talks to Arab Army when they were in Equatoria? They will learn the truth later of what I am seeing now.