Regions
Three MSF aid workers kidnapped in Darfur
March 12, 2009 (PARIS) — Three aid workers from workers from Medecins Sans Frontieres Belgium have been kidnapped yesterday in Sudan’s Darfur, an aid worker told Sudan Tribune on Thursday.
The kidnapped workers include a nurse from Belgium, a doctor from Canada and a French coordinator. There were two Sudanese arrested with them but they are now released, the MSF official told Sudan Tribune on condition of anonymity.
The kidnapping has been confirmed by the hybrid peacekeeping force in Darfur.
(ST)
madesio ukel
Three MSF aid workers kidnapped in Darfur
Sorryful information,you arab you think of fight all white man on world or what?
No relation between NGOs and ICC.
bad thinking will put an end your life.
I hope you will agreed Ban Ki Mon Statment and US president Obama,yu will not defend yourselves any longer.
It,s time to paid the debt of nature.
Angelo M
Three MSF aid workers kidnapped in Darfur
I feel so bad about anybody harming those innocent medical staffs who went there to help Sudanese, but are now being targeted, how foolish for those kidnapped them!
celso agole
Three MSF aid workers kidnapped in Darfur
It is really a shame to sudan government for the step they have taken to kidnapped humantarian workers.
As they were requested for defer of the ICC for president Bashir at this juncture they are worsening the situation.
Are you really sincere that million of sudanese are to get finished because of notorious man called Bashir.
Agole
alex
Three MSF aid workers kidnapped in Darfur
Hello everyone, im really worried for the violent escalation of facts and thoughts against humanitarian organization and worker in North Sudan. Im an internacional operator, working like a simple employee and im hired to do in south sudan for work in little italian n.g.o. in a sanitarian project. first of all im afraid that this kind of answear againt humanitaria worker can expand also to the south.
Moreover i want to explain here my opinion: i think that under bashir words, there is a part of true,when he says that only 1% arrive to the last beneficiaries of a development plan. may be cause this governament that finance a plan, has not only humanitarian interest in where spent his money, but also other kind of interest.is like the end of second wordl war, when U.S. “helps” europe for recostruccion whit Marshall plan, whit the prinipal interest to create a new zone where expand u.s. trade. But this opinion cant explain a violence against who gone over the word for doing something pure, something cause his hearth need it, or cause he believe in a more wright world. moreover, for explain why sometimes cooperation projects are financied by government and little resources arrives to the beneficiaries, i think that we need to see all the organization that a project need.
and more important is that i think that projects like sanitarian or emergency, supply to garantee fondamental wright of people, where local cant do it for any reason.
Sorry for my english and love and peace for all.