Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Sudan Tribune

Plural news and views on Sudan

A rapturous reception of a forgotten heritage of South Sudan

By James Gatdet Dak

May 17, 2009 (JUBA) – “I have been telling people for several years that if the words of Ngundeng were true, the dang would be found and returned to our land,”said elder Gatkuoth Deng. “Then I heard this news about dang last month that it was found and be brought home, I could recall my arguments about it,”he continued.

A rapturous reception of Ngundeng’s dang as the plane carrying it got engulfed in the middle of the runway by a crowd of thousands of people wanting to touch or see it, Juba, May 16, 2009 (photo ST - J.G.Dak)
A rapturous reception of Ngundeng’s dang as the plane carrying it got engulfed in the middle of the runway by a crowd of thousands of people wanting to touch or see it, Juba, May 16, 2009 (photo ST – J.G.Dak)
It was in April this year that news began to spread about the coming back of a historical artifact which many people forgot about, but some believed it would return to South Sudan someday. This is an artifact called ‘dang’ or rod which was divine to Ngundeng Bong. He was believed to be a prophet in some parts of Upper Nile region from around 1840’s until his peaceful death in 1906.

The dang arrived Juba on Saturday, 16th May 2009. Anticipating its arrival time, thousands of people began to gather at Juba airport looking up at each plane that was landing from eastern side of the airport. They were told the plane would come from Nairobi at around 11:30AM. That did not stop them from starting to stare up in the skies from around 9:00AM looking for the unidentified plane.

Police and airport security personnel were deployed ready to maintain calm and order if the normal protocol personnel were to be overwhelmed by the huge crowd. That did not help either. The plane arrived at around 11:30AM. “That is the plane,” said one informer. In a matter of few minutes the plane found itself engulfed by thousands of people in the middle of the runway as police and security personnel were overwhelmed and could not stop the roaring and fast moving crowd.

Douglas Johnson stepped down from the plane. “That is probably the white man bringing the dang,” murmured some. I approached Biel Kong, a man among the crowd and standing near me. “How would you know it is the original dang when you have never seen it or known how its looks like?” I asked him. “Ngundeng talked of ‘dang mi yiel juoc,” he replied. His answer in Nuer was referring to a foretold Ngundeng’s description of his dang with a ‘broken tip from one end.’

I decided to ask another person a similar question to see if the answer would be the same or not. The other fellow I asked, and who happened to be a university student in Juba, gave me a different version of proving that the dang was the original one. “You know, those Europeans are not like us. They understand the importance of history and so they preserve it for centuries,” he confidently assured me.

The crowd continued scanning every single luggage that the airport personnel were unloading from the plane hoping to detect the bag carrying the dang. Little did they know that the dang was already among the bags they were looking at in front of them. Organizers were waiting for the region’s VP Dr. Riek Machar to receive it. He was still in the VIP’s lounge with AU delegation, led by former South African President, Thabo Mbeki, who had paid a one-day visit to Juba for talks on peace efforts with the semi-autonomous government.

Suddenly pushing began as bodyguards tried to open a narrow space through which Dr. Machar could get to where the bag was. He got hold of the bag and began to struggle through his way back. A peaceful chaos ensued. The crowd encircled him, grabbing his shoulders trying to stop him as every body wanted to touch the bag or see it at a close range. “If I can get a chance to touch it I would be very happy indeed,” shouted one struggler.

A bull got slaughtered beside the plane for ‘kier’ or sacrifice to welcome home the dang. At Machar’s residence thousands of people began to gather in anticipation of a celebration where he and Douglas would open the bag and display the dang for people to see. More government ministers, MPs and elders began to arrive. By about 1:00PM the celebrations began. Musicians and traditional dancers took to the stage to entertain the already exciting crowd. Traditional songs by group dancers from different tribes could be heard from all corners. Others were chanting the songs of Ngundeng amid ululations and blowing of trumpets. Understandably, Dinka and Nuer group dancers and traditional singers dominated the scene, probably because of their long time knowledge about Ngundeng.

After several speeches by dignitaries, it was time for Machar and Douglas to open the bag in front of the people. Every one was eager to see it. The dang, black in colour and looking old but straight and strong, confirmed the expectation of Biel Kong. It is broken on the tip of one side, which earned its description by Ngundeng as ‘dang in yiel juoc.’ The broken piece (tip) was still held to the main body by strings which looked like they were made of steel. Another bull was slaughtered after it was taken out of a long bag.

Nuer elders I spoke to could not tell exactly when the dang was made. Some say it could be around 1860s some years after Ngundeng assumed his role of prophet while others are not sure. If the estimation of 1860s is correct the dang would be about 150 years old. It was taken by the British colonial administration to England more than 80 years ago in 1927.

Ngundeng, whose name means ‘Gift of God’ in Nuer language, was born around late 1830s. His father, Bong, originally came from Bul-Nuer in Western Nuer (present day Unity state), but moved to Jikany-Nuer in Eastern Nuer (present day Upper Nile state) where Ngundeng was born. Ngundeng was the only child of his mother, Nyayiel, who came from the Lou-Nuer in Central Nuer (present day Jonglei state) where he conducted most of his activities.

According to Ngundeng’s book written by Professor Douglas Johnson, Ngundeng’s mother gave birth to him after she was barren for dozens of years and her hair turned grey and reached menopause as she was very old.

Nyayiel then left her husband, Bong, in Jikany-Nuer and lived with her parents’ relatives in Lou-Nuer until a dream came to her at night commanding her to go back to Bong so that she would give birth to a child whose name would be called ‘Ngun-Deng.’

Some elders recall that Ngundeng’s prophecies during his lifetime generation were challenged. Whenever he prophesied about future, he would be ridiculed and called a liar. He would only defend his words by saying that it was God who gave him the messages and that God could not lie, but “his delays in fulfilling prophecies are his only lies.”

When asked whether this generation’s elders believe his prophecies, elder Makuach could not mince his words. “Yes, we now believe them unlike his [Ngundeng’s] generation because his prophecies are being fulfilled during this generation,” he said. “When we compare what he said and what is happening now in Sudan, you can without any doubt see that he was very accurate,” Makuach continued.

Ngundeng also built about 60 to 70 feet high pyramid at Bieh around 1880s. It was bombed and demolished by warplanes of the British colonial administration during their 27-year on and off war with the Nuer, leaving a small part of it intact.

Mary Boya, a musician from Murle community, told the crowd that she could hear about Ngundeng when she was still a very small child in her community. “I could hear about Ngundeng since I was small but couldn’t understand what it was all about,” she explained.

“Ngundeng is a prophet of God, his words are true, but he is not God and cannot be worshipped like God,” replied a young man from Nuer traditional dancers when I asked him why would some people call Ngundeng God and others call him Prophet. “People should understand the difference between a Prophet, God’s son and God himself,” he said.

Deng, a Dinka youth member from Northern Bahr Ghazal who attended the occasion declared that Ngundeng was a prophet, not only for South Sudan, but for all the black people of Africa.

“Together, together, all of us together,”chanted the crowd as they referred to the unity of the people of South Sudan. Elders who volunteered to educate people about Ngundeng at the occasion explained that the prophet was a peace-maker among the black people of Sudan. According to them, Ngundeng’s lifetime witnessed peace among the Nuer and with their neighbours. They said he stopped the Nuer from raiding their neighboring tribes and encouraged good neighborliness. They explained that the dang was used for peace-making by Ngundeng and never used it to threaten others unless in self-defense. “This action of self-defense occurred once when he struck dead invading neighboring tribal warriors with it,” the elders further explained.

16th May was declared during the event as a day on which the return of dang Ngundeng would be commemorated every year, probably at his religious headquarters, Bieh, in Wec Deang, Jonglei state. The day also coincided with the historic day on which the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A) was founded in 1983. However, the major SPLM/A annual celebration in the capital, Juba, has been postponed to 26th May this year.

(ST)

24 Comments

  • Kim Deng
    Kim Deng

    A rapturous reception of a forgotten heritage of South Sudan
    Folks,

    May 16 was declared as a day when Dang returned from the looters to Holy land/Bieh and it will be celebrated every year.

    To those who don’t know the history, NgunDeng is not God, but Prophet like Moses, Jesus or Mohammed. Most people are confused about who was Ngundeng since then especialy non Nuer.

    What a wonderful celebration that will be conducted across Nuerland especialy within Holy land/Bieh! The Naath community will be expecting other communities to join in and celebrate the welcoing of Dang together with them.

    Reply
  • Busta
    Busta

    A rapturous reception of a forgotten heritage of South Sudan
    I wish that Dang stick clear a way Dinkas in Equatoria land.

    If that Dand stick could do a miracle to do away with Dinkas in its land due its people have no where to stay it would be really very grate!!

    Dang stick we are waiting to see what you are going to do with those who want to occupy your land.

    Dang stick oyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Nuer stick oyeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

    Reply
  • Manyang
    Manyang

    Ngundeng Bong’s artifacts are historically important as a symbol of resistant to Western imperialism: By Manyang Deng>
    < I welcome the return of this crucial artifact to our land. I respect the view and the feeling of excitment among some quarters in South Sudan. Historically, This artifact of Ngundeng Bong is very crucial to the Naath people and the entire people of Southern Sudan. My main concern is that some people among the Nuer are abusing the name of this great prophet of his time. The prime example of the people abusing Ngundeng Bong's name is our current vice president Hon Dr Riek Machar Teny Dhurgon. He claimed he was prophesized by Ngundeng Bong to be the leader of Southern Sudan. He claimed, Ngundeng prophesized that a handsome,well educated, left-handed and with gapped upper teeth and who will marry to a white lady will one day be the leader of independent South Sudan. Hon Dr. Riek Machar claimed he is the one who matched that description. Hon Dr Riek Machar use the self-proclaimed prophesy about himself to get married to a white lady "Emma" who was later buried in Riek's place at Leer when she died of Road accident in Nairobi. The self-proclaimed prophesy about Hon Dr Riek machar was the main drive behind his defection from SPLM/A in 1991. Riek's intention was to fulfilled Ngundeng Bong prophesy about him becoming a Southern Leader which never materialised. Some Nuers go to the extreme and claimed that Ngundeng Bong prophesized the death of our late Leaders Dr. John Garang de Mabior, Cdr William Nyuon Bany and others. My advise to Ngundeng Bong believers is not to abuse the name of this great prophet. Do not try again to use Ngundeng Bong's name for fulfilling your political ambition. You have all learn the bitter lesson from the 1991 split in the SPLM/A. Hon Dr. Riek Machar ambition of becoming a southern leader as prophesized by Ngundeng was brought to a bitter end when his subjects scattered like sheep without a sheperd and he ended up in Khartoum as a supporter of the fundamentalists regime he intended to liberate southerners from. The fact that Hon Dr Riek Machar is now at the center of the return of Ngundeng Bong's artifacts is really worrying. The fact that Hon. Riek is the second in charge of GOSS and the return of Ngundeng's Dang at his time may give him false impression. He may assumed the self-proclaimed prophesy about him becoming a southern top leader is closer to being fulfilled. In addition, the return was made to coincide with historic SPLM/A day (16th May) when the people's revolution was launched. Ngundeng Bong supporters suggested the 16th May will be celebrate every year to commerate the return of the artifacts. I do not have problem with prophet believers celebrating the return of artifacts every year.They should not use again prophet's name for cheap political manovreing as some did in 1991. Ngundeng Bong's artifacts are historically important as a symbol of resistant to Western imperialism. Many southerners who are deeply concern with the suffering of our ancestors in the hand of imperialists may pay visit to Ngundeng Bong's holy site to pay respect to our past heroes. The artifacts were stolen and the holy destroyed to break the will of Naath people who fiercely resisted imperialism. I respected the hitorical important of Ngundeng's artifacts and not his prophesies which are pass on from generation to generation. His prophesies were distorted over years and now lack creditability to believed. Historians will agree with me. To get more information about my comment read the book titled "Emma's wars". By Manyang Deng

    Reply
  • marial mach aduot mach
    marial mach aduot mach

    A rapturous reception of a forgotten heritage of South Sudan
    Dear Kim and Culprits

    I do believe and acknowledge the excitement of Nuer people on arrival of dang specially those who went to Khartoum during the 1991 defection. Their god has arrived, but let me correct the mistake repeated by many of you regarding Dr. Riak leadership. If there is ever prophecy made by Ngongdeng or whatever, regarding Riak and his Nasir faction on the reason that let them go to Khartoum, then Riak will be a leader of south. But what I know so far this group are labouring the illusionary that will not materialise political. Your political inability guided by the magician of this fake god will not deliver you any leadership unless otherwise qualify. I wander if the Vice President seen himself in the picture while carrying dang? His approach to such issues proved him as the leader of useless group that he led. To be clear I mean (Nasir mate) not Nuer in general. But believe it or not Riak will not be a leader through dang or whatever meant if his gun failed him last time in 1991. Please let give up these foolishness and let behave intellectually. We need to be sound minded when we try to talk about real politics not political euphoria of dang or shit that are being run between Juba by Riak’s groups.

    Marial mach aduotdit mach is a political ideologies far away from Riak’s political euphoria

    Reply
  • Achuil Manyuat Tong
    Achuil Manyuat Tong

    A rapturous reception of a forgotten heritage of South Sudan
    south sudanese should just celebrate for the return of the rod and avoid unneccesary complains.British have been keeping and useing most of African materials.
    thank for the return.people should not go back to all the useless stories of the past.

    Reply
  • Garang Arok
    Garang Arok

    A rapturous reception of a forgotten heritage of South Sudan
    THE DANG,

    We are all proud of this historical rod and I must say again we really give it a home welcome,but something should be held clear,”THE DANG” is a good history that needs all of us to build on it in writing the modern history of sudan,this fact should be given a credit……..whereas ”DR.RIEK MACHAR”is bad history himself.so to separate the good and most needed history from bad one,DR.RIEK must stand far away from the DANG.
    It looks funny but this is the reality of matter.

    Conviniently,the choice is clear,we either mix the two histories and get none or we take the good one and put aside the bad one.

    Reply
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *