Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Sudan Tribune

Plural news and views on Sudan

NCP, SPLM officials exchange blame over inevitable separation of the South

January 10, 2010 (JUBA) – Senior officials of the Sudan’s ruling parties in both North and South marked the 5th anniversary of the 2005 peace deal with accusations and counter-accusations over failure to make unity attractive as the people of Southern Sudan are left with only twelve months to possibly vote for independence.

Gration_with_Ghazi_and_Agar.jpgOfficials of the National Congress Party (NCP) and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) on Friday, 9th January, exchanged blame over what they saw as “inevitable” independence of the South in January 2011 referendum because the other party did not do enough to convince Southern Sudanese to vote for the unity of the country.

The Southern Sudan referendum law was passed two weeks ago, paving the way for the conduct a referendum by the people of Southern Sudan to either choose to create an independent country in the South or confirm the current unity of the Sudan.

Addressing a political rally on Friday in the Blue Nile state’s capital, Damazin, the SPLM deputy chairman and Governor of the state, Malik Agar, accused the NCP of failure to make the unity of Sudan an attractive option for southerners.

He said the current situation shows signs of separation between North and South, and also warned that secession of the South would lead to war if issues like border demarcation and oil were not resolved.

The SPLM deputy chairman further expressed fear of insecurity in Abyei and Nuba Mountains if the South separates.

To remedy the situation, Malik said the only path for unity is to apply confederation between North and South and better structures of decentralization.

“We still have an opportunity to make the unity attractive for the southerners if we abandon assimilation ideology,” he said.

However in a rare admission of the inevitability of the South becoming an independent country, the NCP has recently appeared to have given up on optimism to keep the country united and resigned to the pro-independence wind in South Sudan.

Al-Dardiri Mohamed Ahmed, a leading figure at the NCP, was quoted as saying that the separation of the south from the north became the “reality and inevitable” blaming the Sudan People Liberation Movement (SPLM) for this outcome.

“We should be realistic and talk about what is current and what should be. We in the NCP were keener than anyone else on unity, but the SPLM blocked that option for us, and we missed the opportunity” he said.

He pointed out that the two parties should instead concentrate in building on positive future relations between the two would be countries, adding that North and South should have “brotherly relations” in the post-independence scenario.

On the same day, the SPLM Deputy Secretary General for Southern Sector, Dr. Ann Itto, instead blamed the NCP for failure to make unity attractive.

Dr. Itto said the time to talk about making unity attractive has already expired and become meaningless, adding that what the party is looking towards to is the conduct of referendum in which the people of Southern Sudan will decide by themselves what they want.

Dr. Itto also slammed the recently released report by a number of Oxfam-led Non-Governmental Organizations on the situation in Southern Sudan.

The report prompted or coincided with the American administration’s expession of concern made in the person of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who spoke about the general situation in Sudan and the insecurity and need for responsible governance in the South.

“In Southern Sudan, no matter the outcome of the referendum, Southern Sudan must increase its institutional capacity and prepare to govern responsibly, whether as a semiautonomous region within Sudan or a newly independent nation,” Clinton said.

Dr. Itto however told a group of journalists in Juba on Friday that the report, despite having some accurate issues, is largely inaccurate because it has painted Southern Sudan as “doomed and gloomy.”

She argued that the region has not failed and was trying its best to improve on good governance and security.

Earlier, the Kenyan midwife of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), General Lazarus Simboyo, in an interview with the BBC on Friday on secession of the South said he did not mediate the peace deal between NCP and SPLM with the intention of dividing Sudan, but admitted that the separation of the South from the North looked “inevitable.”

He called on the international community to redouble its effort in assisting the two parties in the process of referendum exercise and to resolve the remaining issues, particularly to quickly demarcate the North-South border in the count down to referendum in January 2011.

(ST)

34 Comments

  • Oduko
    Oduko

    NCP, SPLM officials exchange blames over inevitable separation of the South
    Mr Oduko has back Junubs !! first of all thank god for new year that we in but sad that my Eqautoria Logic boy has surrender to Sick servce goverment of criminal Kiir and his D.K. wilds dogs.

    New message

    Oshay and I still can’t believe what make our strong brother LOGIC surrender to Kiir goverment seriouly :=(

    Reply
  • Abu-chook
    Abu-chook

    NCP, SPLM officials exchange blames over inevitable separation of the South
    Haaaa!! NCP it is Too Late to Make Unity Attractive,

    It is sooooo funny to read this article. Because the NCP just admits too late and little to save the “Unity of Sudan.” The belame must be put on the NCP because of its fake ideology and dishonesty for the last five years since the born of the CPA.

    11 months to go and the New Nation will be born: In my opinion, this is an actuality over a reality. Because the lesson learned ; the lesson must not repeat itself. On January 9, 2011, Sudan must be break or make it(fake unity with the NCP. Too late to make Unity attractive for many many of reasons.(NCP KNOWS THOSE REASONS BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE).

    Reply
  • Dinka Boy
    Dinka Boy

    NCP, SPLM officials exchange blames over inevitable separation of the South
    NCP must let us separate so that we can see how food lovers will live in Southern Sudan.

    Reply
  • tayeb M. Alhassan
    tayeb M. Alhassan

    NCP, SPLM officials exchange blame over inevitable separation of the South
    YES, South Sudan is splitting but not going far away. Sudan in 1956 gained independence and stayed boarding Egypt with the best political and peoples realtions. We must not regret on the lost unity rather than to think of peaceful transformation and mutual relations beyond 2011.

    We are blood brothers and will stay brothers despite inherited bitterness of civil wars which let to this melancholy situation. Brothers in South have to understand that we the people of the North as general we don’t have had a hand of what was going on.

    This is not an apology rather a personal confession not on behalf of all the previous Sudan governments’ killer mistakes committed against all regions of Sudan and South particularly.

    Finally since there are still sparks of unity there is hope but we have to prepare for a peaceful secession and mutual intersts relations.

    Reply
  • Hillary B.M.L,M
    Hillary B.M.L,M

    NCP, SPLM officials exchange blame over inevitable separation of the South
    Believe me Guys, Malik Hagar, even he is a notable figure in SPLA ranks yet have got evil thought in his mind. The idea of Confederation is what he has in his mind, which is decisive idea, we know that he is a Black Muslim and want to be with Northerner Muslims.
    His Idea of confederation is categorically unwelcome.

    Reply
  • Majang
    Majang

    NCP, SPLM officials exchange blame over inevitable separation of the South
    Dear southerners

    who ever will vote for Unity must bring back the 2.5million sourthern Sudanese Doughter and son who died on this strugle.don`t left any single soul on his/her grave.pliz bring my people out of death befor casting your vote in unity or elles I will start a new war agains unity and I mean it.try it and you will see the deep side of my angery heart agains unity.the Arab must remains as arab red muslim.and the African black must remain on our side as Orinal of kush or Sudan that belong to African black.why do we need unity when we don`t even look alike and we have no entermarried with arabs what the use of unity?noway.

    Reply
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *