Monday, November 18, 2024

Sudan Tribune

Plural news and views on Sudan

Chad again seeks to narrow differences between Sudan and JEM

March 15, 2010 (KHARTOUM) – Sudanese government and rebel Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) are holding talks in the Chadian capital Ndjamena as their delegations in Doha failed to progress and still discussing the agenda of negotiations.

The government and the rebel JEM signed in Doha on February 23 a framework agreement negotiated secretly in Ndjamena; but they failed to begin the negotiations and materialize this accord before March 15, as agreed in the deal.

JEM delegation in Doha was steadily objecting to include other rebel factions or to hold separate talks with them insisting they should reunite with them. In addition, the rebels say there will be no peace agreement unless Khartoum delays April elections.

The new round of talks in Ndjamena is mediated by the Chadian foreign minister Moussa Al-Faki who seeks to coordinate with the Joint Chief Mediator in Doha. Chad seemingly very interested to see the two parties reaching a peace deal, as this will allow Deby to stage political reforms ahead of November legislative election which will be followed by April 2011 presidential polls.

Jibril Ibrahim, leading rebel official and brother of JEM chairman, headed from Doha to the Chadian capital to join the other negotiating team of the rebel group.

But the Chadian efforts to push for a breakthrough are also deadlocked.

The discussions include elections, power and wealth sharing and security arrangements, land ownership and compensations. The arrival on Sunday of Sudanese presidential adviser Ghazi Salah Al-Deen to Ndjamena had been expected to boost the talks, as JEM refused the positions offered by Khartoum.

Some sources say Sudanese government offered the post of presidential “assistant”, while others speak about “adviser”; two ministerial posts in the national government and some positions in Darfur region, some sources say it include governors positions other say no.

The most important that JEM rejects the offer made by Khartoum and the Chadian officials seek to forces the two parties to reach a compromise.

There is also difference on the security arrangements.

The rebel officials are seemingly exceeded by the situation but seek to find the best ways to stop the talks with Khartoum and keep good relations with Qatar and Chad.

In Doha, the other rebel group, Liberation and Justice Movement (LJM), is preparing to sign a framework agreement with Khartoum on Thursday 18 March. The signing will be followed by direct peace talks as the two parties are preparing to start.

(ST)

5 Comments

  • David_N
    David_N

    Chad again seeks to narrow differences between Sudan and JEM
    The Chad’s effort to bring separations from North and South, because Gulf States has no intentions towards south to Abyei, the propose and preparations of demacations, advise Darfur Independence and don’t care about Unity Sudan, but Chad and Gulf States to impose Darfuri States Independence.
    And send whole Monkeys with caskets back to Khartoum and it will be the sign in the day light hour!

    Reply
  • Akuma
    Akuma

    Chad again seeks to narrow differences between Sudan and JEM
    Without Chadian government, Sudanese government and JEM rebel can still make compromises because if Bashir fail to bring in Darfur, then Yassir Arman will automatically win election in Darfur areas.

    Durfarian have suffered alots and they need peace around the corners. so, it is not the matter holding Darfur peace in Chadian capital Ndjamena will bring peace in Darfur.
    Darfur Peace will come alone.

    Dr. Akuma.
    Chicago, USA

    Reply
  • Time1
    Time1

    Chad again seeks to narrow differences between Sudan and JEM
    Why is it difficult for Khalil Ibrahim and Al Nur to call a meeting somewhere in Chad and talk out there differences and unite the movements? why can they not talk, what is the problem? each one wants to be a president or what because that will not happen if they do not unite. Darfur people should learn from things that happen in the pst, the should be the rebels mo9vements with the post advantages being rebels operating in modern time, they should take advantages of alot of opportunities available to them to strengthen and unite their stands, but am afriad Darfur people are weakening their stand in the face of their enemies due to their ignorance and division among the different groups.

    Reply
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *