Sunday, December 22, 2024

Sudan Tribune

Plural news and views on Sudan

SPLA: no tribalism in south Sudan just resource wars

By Ngor Arol Garang

August 12, 2010 (KHARTOUM) – Conflict in southern Sudan, that has killed over 700 people this year according to the UN, is over access to resources not tribalism the Chief of General Staff of the southern Sudanese army, James Hoth Mai, said Wednesday.

destroyed huts are seen in the southern Sudanese village of Duk-Padiet, which suffered recent fighting, in southern Sudan Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2009. (UNMIS)
destroyed huts are seen in the southern Sudanese village of Duk-Padiet, which suffered recent fighting, in southern Sudan Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2009. (UNMIS)
Conflict in south Sudan killed over 2,500 people last year according to the UN.

Hoth told AFP, “we don’t have tribalism in south Sudan […] What we have is a war of resources. People just want more cows.”

Hoth was speaking at the launch of a book his new book, “Liberation Struggle in South Sudan,” co-authored by the director of the south’s security and intelligence agency Kuol Deng Abot, which looks into how to resolve conflicts in the south.

In 2005, the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA), to which Hoth and Abot both belong, became the official army of south Sudan and the region granted autonomous status after a peace deal with central government.

The Comprehensive Peace Agreement, that ended two decade-long north-south civil war, is due to end in January 2011, when the south is due to vote in a referendum on whether it wants to chose independence or remain united with the north.

Despite the deal more people were killed in southern Sudan last year than the troubled western Darfur region. Unlike civil war which was fought over political marginalization, religion, ethnicity and latterly oil the current clashes in southern Sudan are simply people fighting over meager resources according to Hoth.

“Armed civilians are killing people for a small gain, not because they have a political vision,” AFP reported him as saying.

The UN estimates that, so far this year violence in the south has forced 152,000 people to leave their homes and killed at least 700 people.

Hoth said that some politicians had a habit of meddling in and triggering conflicts in order to further their political careers.

“Here in Juba, because someone wants to be minister, sometimes they throw a war to their clan,” Hoth told AFP.

As well as politicians being accused of stirring up conflict for their own benefit, Hoth also admitted that military figures had been accused of dabbling in politics.

Addressing the audience at the book launch at Juba University on Wednesday he said the movement is guided by rules and military doctrines that bar them from taking part in politics.

In 2009, the regional parliament of the Government of Southern Sudan passed an act stating that the SPLA were the only legal armed force in the region; responsible for protection of civil population and their properties against external aggression.

Under the law the SPLA are supposed to be a non-partisan force.

“As members of the armed forces, policy dictates that we serve the general public unwaveringly,” Hoth said adding the existing regulations in the SPLA do not allow for people in uniform to participate in politics.

“This is the line that central command council expects all military personnel to toe,” he said.

Hoth called for cooperation from the public:

“The road ahead will not be easy and will require a lot of hard work and commitment from all of us. This necessitates that we work together for betterment of our people and the region. The success and failures ahead of us requires coming together, because it is not the responsibility of one person or one command but all ranks and files. That is, officers, non commissioned officers, politicians and ordinary civilians alike. The key to success is, therefore, collective, meaning the interest of the people of southern Sudan can only served with our concerted efforts.”

(ST)

15 Comments

  • Dinka Boy
    Dinka Boy

    SPLA: no tribalism in south Sudan just resource wars
    Great! the truth must be told like that so the food seekers understand it.

    This is true. No one can disagree with this facts that Hoth Mai did mention during and after the war in the South.

    There is no tribalism,but the conflict of resources whereby those with scarcity of resources armd themselves so that they can atleast get something to eat. This has been the problem since the SPLM/A was formed.

    For those who works in order to undermine the works of SPLM/A should be examine properly and be taught a lesson before meandering around the food’s mission like what the food lovers did against the SPLM/A.

    Reply
  • Pwad Achob
    Pwad Achob

    SPLA: no tribalism in south Sudan just resource wars
    Hi unfaithful humanbeings,

    Running a country requires honesty and personal sacrifices as well as abilities and capabilities to perform to your best.

    The reason why the western countries do better than others is because there is transparency and putting the right person in the right place to do the job not just to please others.

    We are still long way to catch up but there will be no improvement unless we learn from others how they progress. We must take what is good and discard what is bad and make use of other people experiences. But if you just accommodate and cover up thinking that you are on the right track but actually going backward instead of forward, then you have no future. You are burning yourself.

    Southern sudan is in disarray since the CPA was signed. A tribe against another tribe. Another tribe occupies another tribal land and so on. The president does not intervene to solve problems but instead he collobrates with one tribe indirectly like what happened in Piji in Upper Nile when Mr Kiir went by himself to participate in solving the problem between the Dinkas of Atar area but failed to look into the problem between the Shilluk(Collo) and the Dinka during the celebration of CPA in Upper Nile State.

    Is it a good sign? Of course, it is not a good sign. Are there signs that things may start to improve?

    No,you do not know because signs are not encouraging and the leaders are very much concern in planning their own family affairs by taking their families overseas and buying houses and castles in USA, Australia and Europe. Is this a good statemenship. The answer is no. The money going overseas on personal initiatives should have been use to develop the country not to be smuggled overseas. These are public money. But even if they are not public money still we need to control the percentage of money going out of the country.

    This is a disaster.
    God knows our future.
    God bless poor southern sudanese who missed out to find good leaders.

    Reply
  • Pwad Achob
    Pwad Achob

    SPLA: no tribalism in south Sudan just resource wars
    You Dinka Boy or Dinka stupid,

    If you can’t understand and digest what I try to convey that is your own problem because you seem to be an arrogant little boy with a little brain.

    I don’t want to waste my time on this website with you. You will soon face the reality of being stupid and arrogant.

    Away with you and your gangs.

    Reply
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *