What kind of message is S. Sudan’s army program sending to the country?
By Bol Jek Nhial
October 22, 2011 — It is good to have a South Sudan armed forces program that raises the morale of our people, but what is the purpose of the program hosted by Malaak Ayuen on national television? What kind of message does he want to convey to public? Does Malaak personally own the program in order to downgrade other ethnic groups in South Sudan? In his SSTV program, Malaak attempts to promote tribalism and favouritism; leading on from this view the question should be asked if his a political or a military program?
It is very shameful in my opinion to continue to steer public emotion on national television. Why on earth a man would work to tirelessly divide this nation with hateful information I don’t know. I think Malaak has his own hidden agenda contrary to the government and the people of this nation. I honestly appreciate that The Citizen’s editor Nhial Bol is gentle and wise enough to reflect the truth. I have read a lot of his patriotic messages delivered by him through his straight talking columns. To me they were constructive and corrective.
Last week, Malaak was talking on the struggle of people of greater Bar El Ghazal region and their role in South Sudan’s independence on 9 July. I am proud of this day but I don’t see any reason why Malaak lost his topic and went astray, beginning to talk of the Dinka of Bahr El Ghazal fighting Nuer cattle raiders, the Bagara and Paulino Matip’s militias. What was the benefit talking about Nuer cattle raiders and Paulino Matip Militias at that moment? Do they still struggle against Nuer? The lessons I learned from the armed forces program of Malaak on SSTV are:
- The people of Dinka were the strong in bringing about their own independence.
- Other citizens of South Sudan were not part of struggle.
- John Garang was the best leader and was in fact not born and shall not be born on earth.
- There are no patriots except SPLM members.
Malak said the Toposa people were bought with biscuits and Tania. To me this is not necessary, there are many examples of Malaak jumping into politics or at tribalism which has nothing to do with the military, such as the way he talk of Vice President on what so-called apology. What is the relationship between the armed forces program and Malaak’s intolerant treatment of Machar’s apology to the Dinka Bor and to many SPLM/SPLA members.
Many selfish communities think that 1991 was wrong but to some people of South Sudan it was corrective and a ‘road map’ for our independence. The massacre of Gajak and the Lou Nuer are considered as expenses or costs of revolution by many SPLM members although they have a different attitude to what happened to the Bor communities in 1991.
Now people describe it as a massacre but it only is called that because in happened in Bor in 1991 at the time of the split in the SPLA. Why is it not also painful when it comes to matter of the Gajaak, Lou Nuer and Gawaar communities in 1985 when some of their leaders were killed at the behest the SPLA chairman John Garang?
The Government of the Republic of South Sudan must stop Malaak from airing divisive messages and stop him working on this program.
The SPLA army has put in jail David Biel Jal the general secretary of UDSF who has more reason to talk politics than Malaak Ayuen. But just because he told Al Jazeera news that the new cabinet were old faces the army detained and jailed him for the reason that he is an army officer in the SPLA. Why not then arrest Malaak Ayuen who talks politics and criticizes part of his government, like the vice president. Malaak has nothing to talk of, except what was wrong of Nasir Faction.
The man is wicked enough to poison the country with his illusion. Its like he is repeating Garang’s propaganda campaigns against separatists in the 1980s. That campaign will never unite this people of South Sudan because we need to focus on the future and nation building.
Bol Jek Nhial lives in Juba, South Sudan and is not affiliated to a political party. He can be reached at [email protected].
Longa
What kind of message is S. Sudan’s army program sending to the country?
Bol, you have said it all. This new state, needs people like you who can point out what is going wrong with people in leadership so that good corrections are made. It is not good to say that this community did well during the war and others did nothing. This is completely wrong and we should not condone it if we want to build a healthy society. Freedom of expression should not divide us.
Akuma
What kind of message is S. Sudan’s army program sending to the country?
Nhial Jek Bol, thank you for your concerns. It doesn’t make sense to mention someone has been bought by ABC. It doesn’t work by now. I am a whole Dinka not even mixed blood but I condemn such talk. I ‘ve lost several people, a good number of them died during war time not in frontline but bribed by Dinka men who turned black arabs in late 2000s as “sacbarat” those who were in Wau knows it. But you
Akuma
What kind of message is S. Sudan’s army program sending to the country?
But you need to be very sure that a lion who killed first its prey knows strength and obstacles it passed through till it finally got the prey. You should also know the law of volume that the larger the object the larger place it occupy. Thanks.
Ajang Biar
helloo
lool i think this Article posted by the writer about Malaak Ayuen is too bias….it is based on opinions and envity and what Malaak Ayuen said itz definately the real truth you kno so we dont see any harm in that 🙂
Longa
helloo
Please can you point out how bias is the article is? The article is talking about what the horse mouth had said on SSTV. If I say, “This is a bull” and somebody analyzed my sentence, is it an opinion? Let us not support things blindly because somebody out there is my…… Can you point out what is definite truth? And what is truth? Can you point them out?
Madina Tonj
What kind of message is S. Sudan’s army program sending to the country?
Bol Jek Nhial
Only you haven’t understood what others people said before.Every human being can express the story in many ways for example, there are some people said, separation of South Sudan was brought by Riek Machar Teny, the people who manage to remain to stayed on cost don’t want to hear the Idea of Riek Machar Teny has brought separation. Freedom is to express your thought that is all abou
Ambago
What kind of message is S. Sudan’s army program sending to the country?
A politicized military is always a recipe for national disunity.
The war is over, and we know what it all took us through. We need to heal our relationships and rise above the sentiments of ethnic politics.
Save us all these disinformation and take the soldiers back to barracks. Keep the Military out of politics or the price is too dear to pay.
Longa
What kind of message is S. Sudan’s army program sending to the country?
Exactly! military should be out of politics, otherwise the situation of Sudan army will be repeated in South Sudan. Sudan army is a politicized military that is why the military control Sudan up to now. Military is for defense not for politics.
Phil
What kind of message is S. Sudan’s army program sending to the country?
Corruption, racism and Jihad were major factors brought about division of Sudan. It’s shocking that elements with spirit similar to that exercised by former enemies in the north are allowed a platform in the new republic (RSS). Evidence of corruption in RSS is appalling whilst tribalism and violence driven by tribal interst are parallel with racism and jihad practised in the north. Change now…