Arabs who ignored Darfur cannot be outraged
Editorial, The Daily Star
BEIRUT, August 02, 2004 — The crisis in the Darfur region in western Sudan has moved up another notch on the scale of global diplomatic intensity, while Arab involvement seems to be going in the other direction. The United Nations Security Council has passed a US-backed resolution demanding Sudan disarm militias blamed for atrocities that helped send refugees streaming out of Darfur. Two days ago France began deploying troops and aid along Chad’s border with Sudan, and British soldiers reportedly have been put on standby for a possible deployment to Sudan. International pressure remains high on the government in Khartoum to act quickly in Darfur, or else face international sanctions.
The situation in that troubled region has been developing for a year and a half, and the Sudanese government has been widely accused of supporting the Arab militias in a brutal campaign to drive Sudanese citizens of African origin out of Darfur. Some 30,000 people have been killed, a million have been forced to flee their homes, and an estimated 2.2 million people are in urgent need of food, medicine and other basics.
In the midst of this ongoing humanitarian crisis, the world is actively debating whether this is ethnic cleansing, genocide, a crime against humanity, or all of the above. The Arab states, meanwhile, seem to be taking a more relaxed approach to the situation. The Egyptian foreign minister said after a one-day visit to Sudan that he hoped the Khartoum government would “deal positively” with the UN, and also urged Western powers to understand the situation in Darfur was complex. He said Sudanese officials expressed a desire to work with Egypt, other Arabs, Africans and the entire international community to resolve the Darfur crisis.
If this is the case, why did Egypt and other Arab states not move earlier to work with Sudan to achieve a breakthrough? Sudan and the UN secretary-general reached agreement a month ago to disarm the janjaweed militias and accept human rights monitors in Darfur. The rapid pace of international intervention in Darfur has not been welcomed by many Arab officials and observers, some of whom even suspect ulterior motives for Western troops arriving in the region. Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa said it was unacceptable that Sudan become a “playground to accept troops from tens of thousands of miles away” from countries that are hostile to the Arabs.
This is perplexing to the point of absurdity, and collective Arab shame. The Arab League and its officials have been inexplicably silent during the past 18 months as the Darfur crisis has unfolded before their eyes. Those who have brandished only silence in the recent past have no credibility when they express outrage or concern today, or caution prudence. Are a million refugees and 30,000 dead next door not enough reason to act? Foreign troops are coming to Darfur for humanitarian reasons, because the Arab neighbors who should have acted faster remain docile and indifferent.