Sudan won’t yield on refusing no-fly zone over Darfur
By DANIEL BALINT-KURTI, Associated Press Writer
ABUJA, Nigeria, Nov 6, 2004 (AP) — Sudan said Saturday it would not budge from its rejection of a no-fly zone for its Darfur region, dimming chances for a peace accord after months of talks sponsored by the African Union.
![]() |
Majzoub al Khalifa Sudanese agriculture minister and head of Sudanese delegation to the peace talks speaks to journalist in Abuja Nigeria, Thursday Oct. 21, 2004(AP). |
Majzoub Khalifa, leader of the Sudanese government delegation, told The Associated Press he had insisted that mediators scrap the latest draft plan, which contained a no-fly zone provision, and revert to one that did not include a ban on military flights.
The current draft calls for “an effective cease-fire on land and air, in particular: refraining from all hostilities and military actions.”
Since the talks began two weeks ago, rebels have repeatedly accused Sudan ‘s Arab-dominated government of using military aircraft to bomb black African villages in coordination with ground attacks by pro-government Arab militia.
The government has denied the charges.
Allam-Mi Ahmad, the chairman of the talks, said mediators were unwilling to change the wording of the document now on the table.
“The mediation team has done the maximum possible to reconcile the different positions,” said Ahmad. “It is not worth going back on ourselves.”
Ahmad said the talks would continue for no more than one more week – and might be suspended if there is no agreement by then.
Two previous rounds of talks, convened under international pressure on both sides, failed to produce even partial accords.
In New York, a U.N. draft resolution on Friday urged the warring parties to make peace, promising international support and possible debt forgiveness in return.
But the British draft resolution reiterated that the Security Council would consider “further urgent action” against any party in the Darfur conflict that failed to implement an April cease-fire.
Earlier this week, both rebel groups at the talks – the Sudan Liberation Army and the Justice and Equality Movement – said they would sign a draft security accord, dropping demands for more rigid rules on a proposed no-fly-zone and the disarming of Arab Janjaweed militia.
“The government is just wasting our time. For three days we have just been waiting for them to sign,” said Justice and Equality Movement spokesman Ahmed Hussain Adam.
The United Nations has called Darfur the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, saying the conflict has claimed 70,000 lives since March, mostly through disease and hunger. A U.N. report released last Wednesday said the violence has affected 2 million people and mentioned strong indications of war crimes “on a large and systematic scale.”
During the wait for a breakthrough on the no-fly-zone issue, both sides discussed a more long-term political solution with African Union mediators and Western diplomats.
However, Ahmad said there is no question of such an accord being signed during the current talks.
In southern Darfur, several thousand people who were forced out of a camp in the middle of the night returned to find the site destroyed and its generators and water pump looted, U.N. officials said Friday.
The camp, known as El Geer, was the center of an outcry Tuesday when security forces allegedly forced people who had taken refuge there and in nearby camps to leave.
The top U.N. envoy to Sudan , Jan Pronk, called it a violation of international law.