Home | News    Monday 2 October 2006

Ex-US officials urge military action against Sudan over Darfur


Oc 2, 2006 (WASHINGTON) — Two former senior US officials and a sitting congressman called Monday for the US to lead military strikes against Sudan if Khartoum persists in its refusal to allow UN peacekeepers into its Darfur region.

People gathered during a meeting with members of the Security Council at the Gouroukoun camp for IDP’s, in Goz Beida, Chad, June 10, 2006 (Reuters).

"It’s time to get tough with Sudan," Anthony Lake, who served as president Bill Clinton’s National Security Advisor, former assistant secretary of state for Africa Susan Rice and Democratic representative Donald Payne (news, bio, voting record) wrote in an opinion piece in Monday’s Washington Post.

The three said Sudan President Omar al-Beshir’s Arab-led government had launched a major new offensive against rebels in Darfur, threatening to unleash a "second wave of genocide" against the region’s ethnic African population.

"After three years of fruitless negotiation and feckless rhetoric, it’s time to go beyond unenforced UN resolutions to a new kind of resolution: the firm resolve to act," they said.

Beshir has adamantly refused to comply with a UN resolution calling on Sudan to accept the deployment of 22,000 UN peacekeepers in Darfur, where at least 200,000 people have been killed in more than three years of fighting between rebels and Arab militia funded by the government.

US President George W. Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have issued thinly veiled threats to take tougher action if Sudan continues to reject the peacekeepers.

But they have declined to lay out just what they plan to do beyond naming a special envoy for Darfur, former USAID administrator Andrew Natsios, who met with Bush on Monday.

"An envoy’s role is to negotiate, but the Sudanese have left nothing to negotiate," Rice, Lake and Payne said of Natsios’ appointment.

The trio note that China, a major purchaser of Sudanese oil, is very unlikely to back a new UN resolution either ordering a unilateral deployment of peacekeepers to Darfur or imposing sanctions on Khartoum.

And they argue that even if the Security Council were to mandate tougher action, it would take months to implement.

"By then, Sudan will have completed its second wave of genocide in Darfur," they said.

The United States should push now for a new UN resolution giving Sudan an ultimatum to accept the unconditional deployment of a UN force within a week or face military consequences, they said.

If that fails, the United States, "preferably with NATO involvement and African political support", should strike Sudanese airfields, aircraft and other military assets and blockade Port Sudan, through which Sudan’s oil exports flow, they said.

"Then UN troops would deploy — by force, if necessary, with US and NATO backing," they said.

The three compared such action to the 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia to halt attacks on the ethnic Albanian minority of Kosovo, which was carried out without UN backing but which ended the violence and led to the world body deploying a mission to administer the Serbian province.

"The real question is this," the trio wrote, "Will we use force to save Africans in Darfur as we did to save Europeans in Kosovo?"


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

BlindsSelf-confidence and preparedness against Disasters in Sudan 2020-09-21 11:46:04 Why things are only getting worse and the papers are filled with stories of gloom and doom in Sudan? By Mahmoud A. Suleiman The answer to the previous questions needs to know the reasons first, (...)

South Sudan: On Right of Access to Information and Media 2020-09-19 15:01:51 By Roger Alfred Yoron Modi South Sudan’s Right of Access to Information Act, 2013, in Section 35, enshrines the following: 1- The Minister (Minister responsible for Information and Broadcasting) (...)

Is the Juba Peace Agreement a Turning Point for Sudan? 2020-09-15 18:48:43 By Dame Rosalind Marsden Sudan is looking towards a brighter future after the initialling of the Juba peace agreement on August 31, an important first step towards bringing peace to the conflict (...)


Latest Press Releases

Sudan: Performing arts is not a crime, assaulting women and artists is! 2020-09-20 08:54:28 The Strategic Initiative for Women in the Horn of Africa (SIHA) Sudan is still struggling with militant Islamist ideology KHARTOUM: Central Khartoum Primary Court issued a verdict against five (...)

Civil Society Statement in Response to The Law of Various Amendments 2020-08-14 07:11:00 A Collaborative Civil Society Statement in Response to The Law of Various Amendments (Abolishing and Amending Provisions Restricting Freedom) – Exposing ‘a wolf in sheep’s clothing’ Sudanese women (...)

Remarks by SRF leaders at the Friend of Sudan meeting on peace 2020-08-13 07:58:58 Chairman of the Friends of Sudan Conference, Your Excellency, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, The Prime Minister of Sudan and the participating team from the (...)


Copyright © 2003-2020 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.