Home | News    Monday 23 April 2012

AU calls for resumption of North-South talks


April 22, 2012 (LONDON) - The African Union has called for Sudan and South Sudan to renew discussions on post-partition issues and end the conflict over its disputed oil-rich border that has derailed the AU mediated process.

JPEG - 29.2 kb
Chairman of the Commission of the African Union Jean Ping (AFP)

Chairperson of Commission of the African Union (AU), Jean Ping, called for both sides to stop the "senseless fighting" and called on the two neighbours to "fully implement the security commitments they have entered into".

For nearly a month, fighting between the two nations has intensified over the oil-rich Heglig region which is claimed by both sides. Juba announced Friday that it was pulling out of the area to enable an environment whereby talks could resume but Khartoum has indicated that this could be some way off.

Khartoum denied the South Sudanese army (SPLA) decided to withdraw, insisting that it inflicted a military defeat on the army of its former province. The violence has been the worst since South Sudan seceded last year and tensions have further risen with Sudan’s president Bashir vowing to unseat the "insects" of South Sudan’s ruling party the SPLM.

Such threats are often part and parcel of the brinkmanship of Sudanese politics, analysts say, so it is unclear how seriously his comments should interpreted. South Sudan’s information minister Barnaba Marial Benjamin described them as "unfortunate" to come from a head of state.

However, despite the recriminations, Ping encouraged the two sides to resume talks, under the auspices of the AU High Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP), led by former South African president Thabo Mbeki.

The AUHIP mediation has come in for criticism from both sides raising the prospect that new avenues of mediation may be explored to resolve the issues of security, border demarcation, nationality and citizenship, transitional financial arrangements related to oil transit fees, external debt and the disputed region of Abyei.

At the beginning of April Juba dispatched a high-level delegation including Marial to Nairobi to ask for the help of the Kenyan government in resolving the border crisis in what appeared to be an attempt to sideline Mbeki’s panel.

South Sudan’s information minister said Juba was unhappy not only with the AU report to the UN Security Council about the recent border clashes but also with the overall mediation process. If the AU process could not succeed seven-nation East African regional bloc IGAD should "take over mediation", Marial said.

IGAD played a key role in the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) that ended the two-decade-long civil war between the SPLM and the Khartoum government. The landmark deal paved the way for South Sudan to secede in July last year but many of its provisions were not implemented.

As well as border demarcation, the disputed Abyei region has not held the referendum its was granted to determine its status and popular consultations were not completed in Blue Nile and were not started in South Kordofan where the SPLM-North have since last summer resumed hostilities with Khartoum.

Juba denies allegations that it still backs the SPLM-N and believes the AU should have been stronger in criticising the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) for bombing Unity State, the "aggression" which the SPLA said forced it to react by occupying Heglig for 10 days.

The "Sudanese army until today continues to bomb our areas yet the African Union does not see it as aggression," Marial complained on his visit to Nairobi.

Established in October 2009 to implement recommendations drafted by Mbeki’s African Union Panel on Darfur (AUPD), and despite its mandate being related to finding a solution to the Darfur conflict, the AUHIP has gradually shifted its focus to north-south issues.

Khartoum rejected Mbeki’s proposals on hybrid international/Sudanese courts in Darfur and in July President Al-Bashir scrapped an agreement with the SPLM-N in South Kordofan and Blue Nile that could have avoided or delayed the conflict in the two regions.

The AUHIP had hoped that, as it was signed by Bashir’s powerful assistant Nafie Ali Nafie, the deal would not be rejected.

In more than two years of mediation the panel has made few tangible breakthroughs and has faced many setbacks. A deal on citizenship and security issues was due to be signed by Bashir and Kiir in Juba on April 3 but the border clashes around Heglig led Khartoum to cancel the summit.

Bashir’s first Vice President Ali Osman Taha said Saturday that there will be no return to talks with Juba before the withdrawal of all its troops from Sudanese territory. Taha added that he doesn’t think peace will be achieved with Juba’s current leaders.

In his statement on Sunday Ping stressed "the need for both Parties to refrain from inflammatory statements which not only complicate the current and delicate situation, but also undermine the prospects for brotherly relations between the two states and their peoples. Such statements run contrary to the principles on the basis of which the two countries agreed to resolve the post?secession issues."

He paid tribute to Ethiopian Prime Minster Meles Zenawi for his role as the current chairman of IGAD in supporting the efforts of the AHUIP.

Another IGAD member, Uganda, became embroiled in the north-south diplomatic fallout last week with the country’s military indicating that if the border conflict expanded into all out war Kampala would support South Sudan militarily in the event of an invasion by Khartoum.

"We will not sit by and do nothing. We will be involved having suffered a proxy war by Khartoum," the Daily Monitor quoted General Aronda Nyakairima, Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces, as saying, referring the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA).

Nyakairima called for an urgent IGAD meeting to discuss the border conflict over Heglig.

The Chairperson of the African Union Commission emphasised that "force will never bring about a lasting solution to the issues at hand".

Ping said in the statement: "Both Parties need to exercise the much-needed statesmanship and to be driven by a vision that takes into account the long-term interests of their countries and peoples, as well as by their responsibility towards the region, the rest of Africa and the larger international community."

Ban Ki-Moon, the UN Secretary General, Ping and the European Union have all urged the two sides to establish the joint border security bodies and dispute mechanisms they had agreed to in previous talks.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 23 April 2012 07:42, by E. Defense Forces
  • 23 April 2012 07:57, by Ruach

    What does AU stand for?Arab Union not African Union.Why should Arabs intervene here?

    repondre message

  • 23 April 2012 08:12, by George Bol

    Things that AU and International fail to see against the South are:
    1. Abyei referendum- prevented by the force of Khartoum
    2. Border demarcation- delayed by Khartoum purposely.
    3. Oil theft- Khartoum divert the South Oil- nothing was said
    5. The frequently Bombs and attack South territory-Nothing said to North.
    6. South Kordufan/Nuba and Blue Nile consultation- disrupted and dishonored in their w

    repondre message

    • 23 April 2012 08:45, by Tamongali

      Mr. Bol,it is right, two of the big mistakes committed by our politicians were to accept the referendum of south Sudan without border demarcation and abyie referendum.Not north alone to be blame for that our politician and some international bodies are to be blamed too. Because they insisted on delaying Abyie and border business.Now the result is disastrous( how can u have country without border)

      repondre message

    • 23 April 2012 10:08, by Diu J.Kuek

      To George Bol
      Nothing call International Community whether UN General Assembly or UN Security Council every nation is representing her interest if we don,t stregthan our foreign Diplomacy we can end up with no support.
      Within UN they knows Abyei is part of South Sudan and Panthou(Heglig)if Kiir don.t leave that weak policy that being exercise by useless elite group whom want to enrich themselves.

      repondre message

  • 23 April 2012 08:13, by viper

    AU, with its ping, Mbeki are not neutral and therefore, they do not qualify to mediate the remaining issues between Sudan and S. Sudan. Mbeki has detroyed our image infront of the security council by giving a wrong report against our country. He does not qualify to be the mediator this time. The remaining option is IGAD, if not, then to hell with all talks that have remained.

    repondre message

  • 23 April 2012 08:16, by George Bol

    7. Abyei invasion by Khartoum- Nothing was said.
    8. Attacking Jau many time and bombing Unity state market- Nothing was said against the North.
    9. Cleanisng Nubian and people of Blue Nile- Nothing was said.
    10. ten of 10000 Dinka Ngok displaced in Abyei- Nothing was said. and many more.

    The AU and International need to know that they are focusing on oil transit only and nothing more but its minor

    repondre message

    • 23 April 2012 09:11, by Darkangel
      • 23 April 2012 09:12, by Darkangel

        The South Sudan government has been adamant that it pulled back unilaterally and was not pushed out militarily. Machar said there was no fighting on Friday when the announcement came to withdraw.

        That is not true, according to the testimony from the front lines, which paints a picture of a steady strategic retreat southward by South Sudan since Thursday.

        Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.co

        repondre message

        • 23 April 2012 09:13, by Darkangel

          A bandage around his right hand, Samuel Bol sat in an inner courtyard in the military hospital in Bentiu. For three days, he was stationed at a defensive position north of Heglig. The South Sudanese forces were under heavy aerial bombardment, and on Thursday, a heavy ground attack started.

          "Their forces just kept growing and growing," he said. "We had to withdraw to protect the tanks."

          repondre message

          • 23 April 2012 09:13, by Darkangel

            They pulled back to Heglig, where he was injured on Friday afternoon defending the airstrip from oncoming troops. It was about at the same time that South Sudan announced it was withdrawing from Heglig in response to international pressure.

            Machar said that South Sudan’s army left Heglig at 9 p.m. on Friday and pulled back to Tishwin, the old border between the two.

            repondre message

  • 23 April 2012 08:18, by George Bol

    Now, Khartoum has attacked the SPLA while they withdrawal! what can you say and why are AU and other international organization keep quite?

    repondre message

  • 23 April 2012 09:15, by Tahrir Brown

    I am totally depressed by the so called International Community which is baseless & toothless to S SDN issues, I don’t why when Sdn does aggression to SSdn, they turn blind eye & when it’s S Sdn their eyes are very active, is that justice?

    repondre message

  • 23 April 2012 09:35, by Lion Son

    The call made by AU between Sudan and South Sudan is too late, meaningless and voiceless for help of both sides. What I know so far in this talks is that UN, AU and International Community takes side of Bashir as favouring him but why??????????? God will bless South Sudan and South Sudanese.

    Big Lion

    repondre message

  • 23 April 2012 09:56, by Emmanuel Ajang Solomon

    God, of South Sudan is always there to help us and will continue to help us, but if we are not helping ourselves it can be bad. thinking of our own people,it can be difficult from him to do so all the time.

    God wants people who help themselves and he help them too, not those who kill themselves and wants help????
    God help your people we are in bad hands innocent people cannot konw this as they ar

    repondre message

  • 23 April 2012 11:51, by Nimber

    AU become now a toothless dog!!!!
    I said this because it(AU) propose many talks between South and North but untill then no solution from the AU.
    Otherwise, stop consumming money for nothing.

    repondre message

  • 23 April 2012 12:13, by Martin Kat

    The problem between Sudan and South Sudan shoul not be conducted by Au again, will be conducted by IGAd or out of Africa because African leaders have make South Sudan as their shop where they making money.

    repondre message

    • 23 April 2012 12:23, by Ming Dhal

      These international bodies given to those who can’t see like B.Ki. Moon and John Ping will never solve any thing at all since they are fearing arabs relationship
      The solution will only to allow the two nations to fight and sort out their differences, look at Ping and Moon their eyes can they identify anything wrong? Not at all

      repondre message

Comment on this article

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

On the legitimacy of President Salva Kiir 2021-04-04 17:15:11 by Dr Akec Khoc On March 24th 2021, Nhial Deng Nhial, Minister of Presidential affairs stated that President Salva Kiir is not imposing himself on the citizens. In response to this statement, I (...)

UN Security Council urges South Sudan to establish Hybrid Court 2021-03-23 13:36:41 Council Stresses Need for Justice, Rights Monitoring, Civilian Protection by Nyagoah Tut Pur South Sudan should heed last week’s call from the UN Security Council to establish a hybrid court (...)

Celebrate the elimination of racial discrimination 2021-03-21 17:42:59 Let us Honour and Celebrate the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination on its 55th Anniversary on SUNDAY, March the 21st 2021 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman Do we know that (...)


Latest Press Releases

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


Copyright © 2003-2021 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.