Home | Comment & Analysis    Saturday 19 January 2013

The African Union Meeting: A test of credibility over Abyei


By Luka Biong Deng

January 19, 2013 - The AU Peace and Security Council will meet in Addis Ababa on 25th January on the margins of the 21st Ordinary Session of the Assembly of AU. This meeting will not only be its first meeting of the year but it will be a meeting at the level of heads of state and government to discuss the issue of Abyei and border conflicts between South and South Sudan. This meeting will put the Council at the crossroad and litmus test of its credibility on the Roadmap that it adopted in April 2012.

The Peace and Security Council is the standing decision-making organ of the African Union for the prevention, management and resolution of conflicts. It is composed of 15 members that reflect regional balance within Africa. All member states of the AU agreed, in accordance with Article 7(2) of the adopted Protocol of the Council, to accept and implement the decisions of the Council. The decisions of the Council are taken by consensus otherwise by a simple majority on procedural matters and by a two-thirds majority vote on all other matters. Interestingly, the Council has the power to recommend, pursuant to Article 4(h) of the AU Constitutive Act, intervention, on behalf of the African Union, in a Member State in respect of grave circumstances, namely war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity, as defined in relevant international conventions and instruments.

The genesis of the involvement of the Council in South Sudan-Sudan affairs came when the tension between the two countries deteriorated to the level of war that threatened the peace and stability in the continent. The Council in its 319th meeting, held at ministerial level on 24 April 2012, adopted a Roadmap outlining the steps to be taken to defuse the tension that was then prevailing between the two countries, facilitate the resumption of negotiations to be concluded within three months on the outstanding issues and the normalization of their relations. The UN Security Council, in support to the AU-led efforts, adopted Resolution No. 2046 on 2nd May 2012, which endorsed the AU Roadmap. The Government of Sudan and Government of South Sudan both accepted the AU Roadmap and the UN Security Council Resolution No. 2046.

The Council in its 327th meeting, held at the level of Heads of State and Government, on 14 July 2012, which, among others, reaffirmed that the Parties must unconditionally implement all aspects of the Roadmap. The AU Assembly adopted at its 19th Ordinary Session, held from 15 to 16 July 2012, the AU Roadmap and stressed the need and obligation on the part of the Parties to fulfill fully and expeditiously their obligations under the Roadmap, bearing in mind the timelines contained in the Roadmap.

After the expiration of three months, the Council at its 329th Meeting held at the level of its permanent representatives on 3rd August 2012 requested the AUHIP to submit to it, by 22 September 2012, a comprehensive report on the status of the negotiations, including detailed proposals on all outstanding issues. The meeting also called to convene, within two weeks following the submission of the AUHIP report, another meeting at the ministerial level to endorse the AUHIP detailed proposals on all outstanding issue as a final and binding solution to the pending issues between the two countries. The Council will then transmit the endorsed report to the UN Security Council for consideration and endorsement acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter.

On 24th October 2012, the Council in its 339th meeting, held at the ministerial level, unanimously accepted the proposal submitted on 21st September 2012 by the AUHIP on the final status of Abyei. The Council gave six weeks for the two countries to reach consensus on the proposal otherwise it will endorse this proposal as final and binding and to be forwarded to the UN Security Council for consideration and endorsement. On 14th December, the Council decided in its 349th Meeting to refer the endorsement of the AU Proposal on the final status of Abyei area to its meeting at the level of the Heads of State. Besides referring the determination on the issue of final status of Abyei to its heads of state, the Council reiterated its acceptance of 21st September AU Proposal on the final status of Abyei area and called for the summit between Presidents Salva and Bashir to resolve the pending issues between the two countries.

This account of the lengthy process and decisions taken by the Council at the levels of permanent representatives, ministers and heads of state and governments underscores the commitment of the Council to resolving the final status of Abyei. The process has also involved all the member States of the AU including Sudan. The summit that was held between Presidents Salva and Bashir on 5th January failed to resolve the final status of Abyei and disputed and claimed border areas. In fact the summit in terms of process, ownership and outcome created confusion. The report of the outcome of the summit that was signed by the Ethiopian Prime Minister and President Thabo Mbeki failed to create consensus about the commitments of the summit.

In particular, the issue of Abyei was badly handled in the summit as there was no reference to the AUHIP 21st September Proposal on the final status of Abyei. Paradoxically, the convening of the next summit to determine the final status of Abyei was made conditional to the constitution of Abyei administration and agreement between two countries on a matrix for the implementation of nine (9) agreements signed in September 2012. In fact Abyei after the summit was made as a ransom or even a hostage.

President Bashir will use the outcome of the summit not to discuss the final status of Abyei and subsequently making it difficult for the Council to endorse the AUHIP Proposal on Abyei. Sudan started again with high level diplomatic campaign to convince the fifteen (15) heads of state and government of the Council to contain the issue of Abyei within the continent and not to be forwarded to the UN Security Council. After meeting with all members of the Council, the Sudanese Minister of Foreign Affairs vowed with confidence that the issue of Abyei will not see light and it will not reach the UN Security Council.

In fact Sudan is pursuing rather dangerous and futile diplomatic maneuver that is aimed at creating division and confusion in the Council as well as casting doubt on the credibility of the Council. The trajectory of decision making process followed by the Council to resolve the issue of Abyei shows conscious commitments within its mandate of preventing conflicts in the continent. The Government of Sudan has missed the opportunity to contain the issue of Abyei by allowing it to be discussed by the Council on 24th October 2011 when the Council initially accepted the AUHIP Proposal on Abyei.

Equally, Sudan did not reject but accepted the AU Roadmap and the UN Security Council Resolution 2046 that laid out a comprehensive process of resolving all the pending issues between the two countries. Also Sudan as a member of the AU has agreed not only to accept the decisions of the Council but to implement them. The process for resolving the issue of Abyei has been agreed upon by all members of the AU including Sudan and the UN Security Council and any attempt to withhold and to reverse this process is a clear defiance to the continent and international community.

As the summit between Presidents Salva and Bashir is now scheduled on 24th
January to discuss the final status of Abyei before the meeting of the Council to be held on 25th January, President Bashir has the last chance to accept the AU Proposal on Abyei. In case the summit failed to finalize the issue of Abyei, the heads of state and government of the Council have moral and institutional obligations to endorse the AUHIP 21st September 2011 Proposal on Abyei as final and binding. Failure by the Council to endorse the AU Proposal on the final status of Abyei will not only tarnish the credibility of the Council but it will dash the high hopes that the people Abyei attached to the Council to restore justice and peace in the area.

Luka Biong Deng is a senior member of South Sudan’s ruling Sudan People Liberation Movement (SPLM) and the Co-Chair of the Abyei Joint Oversight Committee and a Fellow at Harvard Kennedy School. He can be contacted at lukabiong@kushworld.org. This article is also published by the New Nation Newspaper - New York, US

The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 19 January 2013 10:36, by Nuer Empire

    Singing a beautiful song of AByei sold by your ancestor take you to get PHD

    • 14 May 2013 07:23, by jerrsex3i

      Your article has helped me to understand this subject on a different level. I would like to appreciate your efforts for exploring this issue. Thank you for your information.
      options trading

  • 19 January 2013 10:53, by Mapuor

    ’In fact Abyei after the summit was made as a ransom or even a hostage’.This quote is from Biong’s article.The summit refers to Kiir and Bashir meeting.Well this issue needs to be handled with a pinch of salt as the motives behind the claim of Abyie are not clear.Panthou was almost lost to this claim when it was cut out from the claimed Abyie when in fact Panthou has never been part of Abyie

    • 19 January 2013 12:43, by nuer food lovers

      mr.Fake Dr.Luka Biong it is to early to fall astaxia when AU have not final endorsed the decision.we sow ur colour right from the of formation of Abyei boundary committee.(ABC)ur astuting article will not help,Abyei have gone mark me right.like Toor Aliny and Kiir Adem u sold with salva kiir in return of Abyei.i just only going to sympathy with bro,s in Awiel &Ruweng who re going to suffer in ur..

      • 19 January 2013 13:05, by nuer food lovers

        created mess.u and Deng Aloor have so much zapped the s.sudan.same trawling guys will consider me as asailing u but it is not the matter.ur vadaling treacherous on s.sudan,God will judge u.dispite ur atheism concept.u re now running away steps by steps leaving s.sudan in ur mess.God will follow u in Harvad kennedy.u red-herring s.sudan ruthlessly from what the mean to Abyeism struggle.ur yowl no.

      • 19 January 2013 13:13, by Tutbol

        I once said, we have Nuer of ethiopia, Nuer of ethiopia, Acholi & Madi of Uganda & Turkana of Kenya. But the Abyiei ngok Dinkas are the weakest in hearts than other Dinkas. Francis m Deng, is a pure opportunist & so does Luka Biong. Why doesn’t S Sudanese let these slaves go.& keep watch if they come back they would be deported to arabs holly lands. They are S Sudanese nuisances.

        • 19 January 2013 13:28, by Tutbol

          The issue of Abyiei has overshadowed the border issues & we have Francis Deng at UN, who had never uttered a word since & our leaders keeping feeding us with their nonsenses when our people are getting on by our enemiess each times. And the likes of Luka Biong wants to veneer themselves on S Sudanese, on how hard they work for our people.

        • 19 January 2013 14:21, by Nibs

          That’s simply because those you’ve mentioned are Nuer, Madi and Acholi but not Dinka. Jieng can never leave her sibling behind. We’ll fight for Abyei,we are not cowards.dinka had fought all those tribes who collaborated with Arabs wanabee and still was victorious.as for Turkana,we don’t have it in south Sudan.we have Toposa. Tut, your comment is pitifully cowardic!

          • 19 January 2013 15:20, by nuer food lovers

            Nibs.unlike the old days of liberation.Dinkas were united.compare to what is going on the ground current.Dinka re divided along trifling and egoism infilited during the interim period.People of Abyei betrayed Ruweng people which may not take part if it is going to a war between Nuer Dinka as they warn for 2015.Luach,Ngok lual yak,Abielang,Agier.will not take part for killing Athor who played ....

          • 19 January 2013 15:32, by nuer food lovers

            the central role in defeating Both Arab and Nuer Malitias triaters.mr.Nibs for ur claimed of the Dinka to liberate Abyei from fake Arab minus other s.sudanese is filth.take example with Mali,in the early yrs 178s was the strongest amongst the west African country under sudiata kiata,samoure Toure and mansa musa who show malian to the world of Islamism.but now what is going on.u can,t disorganised

            • 19 January 2013 15:40, by nuer food lovers

              the country with false claim that u re capable to certain the victory.u re claiming to sympathying guys who cann,t leave behind their sibling.these people have actually destroy s.sudan.even mr. fake Dr.Luka Biong have loss hope in the matter only he is going a permenant refugee in Twic Mayardit Tur-Alei.let them it.they thougt every with postive yielding.

              • 19 January 2013 17:00, by Peacocktail

                Dr.Luka, We South Sudanese are ready to bring Abyei back to it own origin. The problem is Francis Deng who only sitting at UN headquarters enjoying South Sudan name a New Nation... He had never hold Press Conference at NewYork on SAF attack on our people.Our Government must bring him back and sit in Juba.I don’t like they our Government appoint most dominant citizens to very important post..

            • 20 January 2013 11:31, by Nibs

              Nuer food lovers!
              "Dinka liberating abyei minus other s.sudanese is filthy.."oops! Does it really make sense bro? I mean your above name and your quote statement!you’re tribalist and at the same time nationalist,that’s unheard of.Anyway,i’m patriot who love unity of s.sudanese.bro,can we let Arab wanabee take our land because of sibling rivalary?

              • 20 January 2013 15:44, by nuer food lovers

                nibs.u said can we leave sibling becozs of sibling ravarly?no,bro i even have no front line with people of Abyei, but Dr.Biong And Deng Aloor have front line with s.sudanese.becozs they re holding sensitive position offered to them by kiir kuethpiny mayardit.which is currently zapping s.sudan.if u re going to fight Arab over is not my concern,but what of the warning signal from Nuer?

      • 4 May 2013 21:52, by johnsex8a

        I am exploring this topic for a report I have to write. You have good content and I would like to know if you have any other posts about this?
        afternoon tea south wales

  • 18 July 2013 13:05, by Vipul

    We are a customer oriented organisation and we believe in putting our best foot forward in our journey to pinnacle.
    BPTP Park spacio gurgaon project
    New residential apartment in gurgaon

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Why Sudan’s interests lie in U.S. delisting and normalization with Israel 2020-10-22 06:08:56 By: Trayo A. Ali How will the de-linking of the American process for removing Sudan from the State Sponsor of Terror (SST) list from its process of normalizing relations with Israel diminish (...)

No to calls for anti-peace protests 2020-10-22 06:07:08 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman Some traditional Sudanese political parties have grown old and are crying out to demand that the Sudanese people go out on October 21, 2020, in a major demonstration to (...)

The 21 October March: Who is the Enemy? 2020-10-21 05:52:11 By Yasir Arman One of the main features of the December revolution is its vitality and the broad participation of women and youth, resistance committees, martyrs' families, forces from the (...)


Latest Press Releases

Sudan: Performing arts is not a crime, assaulting women and artists is! 2020-09-20 08:54:28 The Strategic Initiative for Women in the Horn of Africa (SIHA) Sudan is still struggling with militant Islamist ideology KHARTOUM: Central Khartoum Primary Court issued a verdict against five (...)

Civil Society Statement in Response to The Law of Various Amendments 2020-08-14 07:11:00 A Collaborative Civil Society Statement in Response to The Law of Various Amendments (Abolishing and Amending Provisions Restricting Freedom) – Exposing ‘a wolf in sheep’s clothing’ Sudanese women (...)

Remarks by SRF leaders at the Friend of Sudan meeting on peace 2020-08-13 07:58:58 Chairman of the Friends of Sudan Conference, Your Excellency, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, The Prime Minister of Sudan and the participating team from the (...)


Copyright © 2003-2020 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.