Home | News    Monday 2 February 2015

S. Sudan rivals ink power-sharing deal in Ethiopia


By Tesfa-Alem Tekle

February 2, 2015 (ADDIS ABABA) – South Sudanese president Salva Kiir and opposition leader Riek Machar partially signed a symbolic power-sharing agreement proposed by the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) on Monday, recommitting themselves to further negotiations on outstanding issues.

South Sudanese president Salva Kiir (L) and former vice-president turned rebel leader Riek Machar (AFP)

According to the agreement signed in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, after midnight (local time), Kiir will remain as president, while Machar will take up will take up his former position as vice-president, replacing the incumbent, James Wani Igga.

According to the new power ratios the South Sudanese government will take up 53%, the SPLM-factions 33%, while other political parties will share the balance.

The parliament will now be expanded to 548 members and shall be dissolved and reconstituted according to the power ratios.

This means the government will comprise 290 members, while the breakaway SPLM factions and other political parties will make up 181 and 77 members respectively.

IGAD’s chief mediator and former Ethiopian foreign minister, Seyoum Mesfin, told journalists that the two principals had agreed to resume further negotiations on 20 February to iron out the remaining differences..

During the recess the two warring parties will consider power-sharing arrangements for the transitional government.

Mesfin said the next direct talks “would be final and that would lead them into concluding a comprehensive agreement to end the crisis in South Sudan” by 5 March.

According to rebel officials, previously dismissed governors will be jointly appointed by Kiir Machar.

However, rebel officials disputed the power-sharing ratios, telling Sudan Tribune that discussions on the matter will resume on 20 February.

Rebels have called for Machar’s SPLM in Opposition, along with the third faction, to share an equal 45% of the power ratio with the government, while other political parties take the remaining 10% share.

They also stressed that the government should be reconstituted at all levels with no exception.


Meanwhile, a planned summit of IGAD leaders to discuss what action to take against the warring parties has failed to take place.

Sources close to IGAD alleged that an exchange of threats and counter-accusations ensued between the presidents of Uganda and Sudan during an initial gathering.

In remarks Ugandan president Yoweri Museveni reportedly suggested the need to crush Machar’s forces militarily, accusing his Sudanese counterpart, Omer Hassan al-Bashir, of supporting South Sudanese rebels.

Bashir responded by accusing Museveni of interfering in the conflict and providing support to Sudanese rebels, warning that both Museveni and Kiir would lose power if Sudan was to back Machar’s fighters.


Observers have expressed pessimism about the latest agreement’s ability to halt the conflict, citing ongoing preparations by warring parties on the ground for further military offensives.

Some international experts questioned the significance of the deal itself, describing it as a “non-agreement”.

A policy analyst on both Sudan and South Sudan currently in Addis Ababa monitoring the negotiations between the South Sudanese factions said IGAD had failed to secure a meaningful deal.

“The red-eyed negotiations just concluded in Addis Ababa could have been a turning point in South Sudan’s conflict. Instead, IGAD has reached another non-agreement,” said the Enough Project’s policy analyst, Justine Fleischner.

She criticised IGAD leaders for acting in their own interests, arguing that the absence of the promised sanctions of regional travel bans and asset freezes meant the warring parties had felt little urgency to adjust their behaviour.

“IGAD’s unwillingness to impose sanctions is in part due to competing regional economic interests and business ties. Meanwhile, the cost of war is being paid by the people of South Sudan,” she said.

The anticlimactic conclusion to the 29th IGAD heads of state summit reflected the warring parties’ lack of interest in achieving a peaceful resolution to the crisis, she said.

“As tanks burn in Upper Nile with the charred remains of their operators still inside, IGAD remains unwilling to break the deadlock by creating consequences for the parties and their uncompromising desire to hold power no matter the cost,” said Fleischner.


Another analyst, Akshaya Kumar, is also pessimistic about how the African Union (AU) intends to handle the atrocities committed by both parties, saying it’s unlikely the first ever Commission of Inquiry report will never see the light of day.

“The AU and IGAD seem willing to sacrifice accountability to get an agreement, but there can be no lasting peace and security without justice,” she said.

She argued that as “South Sudan’s elites play a game of political musical chairs in Addis Ababa,” it’s becoming obvious that their machinations at the negotiating table have little to do with addressing the grim reality of the civil war back home in South Sudan.

It’s understood that regional leaders who dispersed without a decision will likely reconvene after the two parties resume negotiations on 20 February.

Government and rebel forces have been engaged in an armed conflict since mid-December 2013 after a political dispute within the ruling SPLM party over reforms turned violent.

Ongoing negotiations, which are being mediated by IGAD, have so far failed to yield a lasting settlement to the crisis, with both parties coming under increasing international pressure to set aside their political differences and end the crisis.


- IGAD summit postponed again as warring parties renegotiate agreement terms
- IGAD summit on S. Sudan postponed as SPLM-IO lambastes proposed deal

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 2 February 2015 07:42, by Ayuiu Makuac Lam

    I always telling you that #Kiir, is a president with "Yes" because Kiir doesn’t wants innocence civilians to be suffer by senseless war.

    • 2 February 2015 07:52, by Ayom Ayom

      If everyone fought for their own convictions there would be no war

    • 2 February 2015 08:22, by Ayuen deng

      IGAD should agree with President Mseveni if they need real peace in South Sudan, because even if those proposal are sign today still those Riek generals with form a different opposition rebellion a gainst Riek becuase what IGAD is nogeciating over is not what they want.So it’s better to crash them like Alshabab and now Boko Aram. otherwise IGAD is wasting UN resource on no end talks.

    • 2 February 2015 08:56, by Adok Wolu

      power sharing deal
      The international community and the so called IGAD should stand impartial in dressing the South Sudan conflict,then favoring the stooge who have killed tens of thousand innocent Nuer civilians in Juba, masevini must take what he want, red eye agreement will not help south Sudanesebut kiir most go.

      • 2 February 2015 16:32, by Mayom County Boy

        There is a Saying a stomachs does not afraid to be at front,you may do nothing to kir government food lover adok wulo.

  • 2 February 2015 07:47, by Lotodo Awino Odug

    The turn is for the Equatorian to reclaim the position of vice president from Nuer, Riek is all about position, fire him again and he will forms his third rebellion in the near future. The dead nuer and Dinkas were the grasses when the two elephants broke off their tusks.

  • 2 February 2015 07:59, by Ayuiu Makuac Lam

    Let’s Riek Machar, control his army as I heard yesterday the press conference in Leer county where Military commanders were gathered.
    Peter Gatdat, released of continuing war till they will defeat Kiir. Gatdat said.
    the military commanders were: Koang Chuol, Tito Biel, Gathuoth Gatkuoth and James Duop Lam plus Lual Chol Puok. they agreed to follow war till they will defeat government.

  • 2 February 2015 08:07, by Akuma

    Why Riek sign power sharing agreement when his rebels are continuing attacking government troops in Mayom Unity State. We better be sincere to ourselves. Riek himself is disaster to Nuer tribe and South Sudan as a country.

  • 2 February 2015 16:28, by Kim Deng

    Dr. Riek,

    If you sign your own death certificate, the Mighty Nuer Warriors (MNW) will keep fighting until Dinka Kindom is dismantled. For your info, the MNW are not fighting to bring you back into position, which you’re sacked from by King, Slava, but to take revenge and to burn Dinka Kingdom to ashes.

  • 2 February 2015 16:45, by Kim Deng

    In remarks Ugandan president Yoweri Museveni reportedly suggested the need to crush Machar’s forces militarily, accusing his Sudanese counterpart, Omer Hassan al-Bashir, of supporting South Sudanese rebels.Bashir responded by accusing Museveni of interfering in the conflict and providing support to Sudanese rebels, warning that both Museveni and Kiir would lose power if Sudan was to back Machar.

  • 2 February 2015 22:32, by Kenyang

    Why removing Riek and other ministers in first place? Didn’t incompetent Kiir see it coming if power hungry animals like Riek Machar are removed. It is time Pres Kiir give up his position to accommodate Riek instead of usual Cdr Wani Igga.

  • 3 February 2015 09:27, by Gabriel KK

    548 members of parliament is too many for this poor country. shame on the government and greedy Riek Machar.

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

My Memories of the late Imam al-Sadig al-Mahdi 2020-11-27 05:43:38 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman This article comes against the backdrop of the saddening news in the headlines of the News Media reporting the departure of the Ansar Sect leader Imam Al-Sadig Al-Mahdi (...)

Why is South Sudan quiet while Ethiopia is at war? 2020-11-25 20:57:13 By Dak Buoth ‘‘Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better, the silence of the voice of justice when it (...)

SPLM/SPLA-IO: Alive in war, dead in peace 2020-11-24 20:32:42 By Deng Vanang Neutralized by an ineffective 2018 peace deal, with its head no longer the roaring beast of yesteryears, SPLM/SPLA-IO is now ensnared in the toughest dilemma to cross its shakiest (...)


Latest Press Releases

Sudan: Performing arts is not a crime, assaulting women and artists is! 2020-09-20 08:54:28 The Strategic Initiative for Women in the Horn of Africa (SIHA) Sudan is still struggling with militant Islamist ideology KHARTOUM: Central Khartoum Primary Court issued a verdict against five (...)

Civil Society Statement in Response to The Law of Various Amendments 2020-08-14 07:11:00 A Collaborative Civil Society Statement in Response to The Law of Various Amendments (Abolishing and Amending Provisions Restricting Freedom) – Exposing ‘a wolf in sheep’s clothing’ Sudanese women (...)

Remarks by SRF leaders at the Friend of Sudan meeting on peace 2020-08-13 07:58:58 Chairman of the Friends of Sudan Conference, Your Excellency, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, The Prime Minister of Sudan and the participating team from the (...)


Copyright © 2003-2020 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.