Home | Comment & Analysis    Monday 21 October 2019

UNSC, Machar and Lam Akol visits to Juba: Will peace come?


By James Okuk

The coming of the members of UN Security Council to Juba with arrival of Dr Riek Machar and Dr Lam Akolto engage in high-level meetings on evaluation of the status of pre-transitional period as provided in the 2018 Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS)and finalization of the joint decisions on the pending pre-transitional tasks, is a welcome move but will this bring peace and unity? The experiences from the previous visits of the UNSC and face-to-face meetings of the leaders of the rivaling Partiers under external pressure have shown that the level of commitment usually gets beefed up for moving forward, especially when clear messages on what should be done are sent out by the head of the UNSC in unison with the 5 Permanent Members without mincing in diplomatic sugarcoating. Particularly, these leaders take faster steps forward when the USA states it categorically in a public statement that they want to see a change in conduct. With South Africa at the forefront of this call for urgent restoration of peace and security in South Sudan, it is highly probable that the tolerated defiance against the common good shall come to an end soon.

Now at the core of the unfinished and extended pre-transitional tasks of R-ARCSS is the long-awaited top-level political resolution of the number and boundaries of states, based on recommendations of defunct Technical Boundary Committee (TBC) and Independent Boundary Commission (IBC) as presented to the IGAD Executive Secretary and the Parties for urgent attention(since May and September 2019 respectively). The outcome of this consensus has to be incorporated together with other provisions R-ARCSS provisions into 2011 Transitional Constitution of South Sudan (amended), on the basis of which the RTGoNU shall be formed legitimately. The other unfinished task is the enactment of the critical laws of the security and defence sector by the Transitional National Legislative Assembly and assent to all of these by the President of the Republic. Also, the formation of RTGoNU has been conditioned by Article 2.2.1 of R-ARCSS, which requires completion of redeployment of jointly trained and unified necessary forces of the Parties during the pre-transition period so that they operate under One Commander-in-Chief, the President of the Republic, and discharge their duty of protection of the civilians andRTGoNUVIPs accordingly. The third key demand is for the Incumbent Transitional Government of National Unity (ITGoNU) to provide the necessary funds for facilitating all the pre-transitional tasks of the first phase of R-ARCSS implementation.

Given all the above, it is expected that the visit of the members of UNSC and coming back of Dr. RiekMachar and Dr. Lam Akolto Juba will create a better understanding by the R-ARCSS Parties for building consensus on the best practical options available to overcome the hurdles of formation of RTGoNU with full mandate for good governance, sustainable security, state-building reconstruction, reforms of government institutions, enforcement of transitional justice, post-conflict economic development, permanent constitution-making, and conduct of credible elections. The UNSC should remind the parties of their solemn commitment to objectives of the High-Level Revitalization Forum (HLRF)—permanent ceasefire and full implementation of R-ARCSS in letter and spirit based on realistic timelines, and culminating in realization of internationally supervised credible elections after 3 years.

That means if there are provisions and implementation timelines of R-ARCSS that have become obsolete or too ambitious to complete in time, the Principals of the 5 Parties (i.e., ITGoNU, SPLM/A-IO, SSOA, FDs and Opp) should reach urgent consensus to amend these and avoid violations. For example, if they agree to form RTGoNU by 12th November without fulfilling article 2.2.1 on the unification of the necessary forces under one command of the President of the Republic, then they need to amend this provision to eliminate the pre-condition. Otherwise, these Parties should go by the recommendations of the experts in the security and defence sector and accept a limited extension of the pre-transitional period until such task is completed satisfactorily for the RTGoNU to be formed in accordance with the letter and spirit of R-ARCSS. Also if the Parties think that reverting to 10 states will create another crisis because some communities don’t want to share their territorial states with others, it is high time they tell these rivalling ethnic groups that South Sudan can only be kept as a viable Republic when its diverse people learn to live harmoniously with each other in one place and time.

All in all, the UNSC and Principals of R-ARCSS Parties are expected to come out with one voice of peace and security, backed up by honest roadmap of safeguards for the welfare of the people and dignified future where every South Sudanese will be joyful to return home and engage constructively on developmental dividends and reclaiming their power through elections. The political leaders of South Sudan should start being seen visiting jointly and frequently the grassroots in collaboration with UNMISS, and demonstrating to the ordinary citizens by good examples that reconciliation for peace is possible and must be upheld as a priority from leaders to people at the local level. They should start becoming keenly conscious of the plight of the common citizens and take R-ARCSS as the only available opportunity for soft-landing as a carrot, and as a strategic rescue from facing the undesirable consequences from sticks of those who are discontented with the continuation of the bad status quo. They should learn to trust themselves on the possible and appreciatively consult the national academics, civil society activists, eminent persons and elders of religious institutions who are honest to tell the right truth courageously even when this does not please the egos of the superiors. They should learn from the past success stories and avoid repeating the same bad conduct that kept regenerating the conflict and crises in South Sudan. With patience and resilient determination, South Sudan will always remain land of great abundance for every citizen to enjoy.


The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

Comment on this article

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

In memory of Kerbino Wol 2020-06-29 08:17:47 By Robert Portada On 5 June 2020, Kerbino Wol announced that he was standing in solidarity with fellow citizens deep in the sacred land of South Sudan and launching the official manifesto of the (...)

Sudan: Dynamics of change and resistance of political parties to change  2020-06-26 19:15:55 By: Hussein Arko Menawi When we look at the political timeline in Sudan it gives us strong evidence, how the political future in Sudan is critical, bleak and confusing. It is also a good (...)

Sudan’s legitimate request for UN assistance. Who the opponents are and what their ulterior motives? (3-3) 2020-06-26 12:08:29 By: Trayo A. Al Ali Trayo Keep the focus on: Regardless of any inadvertent diversion punctuates the course of this discussion, it is extremely important for the reader to strickly keep the focus (...)


Latest Press Releases

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


Copyright © 2003-2020 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.