Home | News    Wednesday 25 March 2020

Sudan, USS Cole victims ask US court more time to implement compensation deal

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

March 25, 2020 (KHARTOUM) - Sudan and the families of the victims of the attack on the U.S.S. Cole have jointly asked the court give them more time to implement a compensation deal they struck last February.

The port side damage to the guided missile destroyer USS Cole is pictured after a bomb attack during a refueling operation in the port of Aden in this October 12, 2000 (Reuters file photo)On 13 February, Sudanese Justice Minister Nasr al-Din Abdel Bari said that his government would pay $30 million to the families of the 17 sailors killed during the attack on 12 October 2000.

Abdel Bari said the settlement agreement which was signed on 7 February has explicitly affirmed that the Sudanese government is not responsible for this incident or other incidents or acts of terrorism.

However, in a Joint Status Report filed on 24 March, the plaintiffs and Sudanese government lawyers asked the U.S District Court For The Eastern District of Virginia Norfolk Division to give them an additional delay until 3rd April to implement the deal.

"The parties continue to work together closely to complete performance under the binding settlement agreement resolving all claims in the above-captioned actions," reads the joint request seen by Sudan Tribune.

"The parties propose to further update the Court on the status of the settlement agreement no later than Friday, April 3, 2020, and respectfully request that the Court continue the stay of all proceedings and deadlines in these actions through that date".

No details have transpired about the reasons for the delay.

However, Sudanese government which is actually facing huge economic challenges might be not able to honour its commitments to the relatives of the victims.

Trump administration, following calls of the victims and their families, says it will not remove Sudan from the blacklist of terror states unless Khartoum pays compensations to the victims.

The Associated Press last February reported that Sudan, in fact, would pay $70 million

"Adam Hall, a lawyer for the families of the victims, said Sudan would provide $70 million to be split among families of the 17 people killed as well as 15 sailors who were injured in the attack. That money is on top of $14 million that was awarded in an earlier case.

Hall added that $30.6 million is dedicated to the families of the dead and $39.4 million goes to those who were injured.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 25 March 18:16, by Langbaar

    Where is our cloned so-called Arabs of North Sudan going to get that 30 million dollars to pay their evil white Americans *stand-over criminals, black hats, loan sharks or hustlers?* It is time, the South Sudanese government stop paying these vermin our oil proceeds. The Parasites have attached themselves like ’leeches or ticks’ to our country and our people>>>>

    repondre message

    • 25 March 18:32, by Langbaar

      and they thought they would always use South Sudan and the South Sudanese people as their ’geopolitical chess game or football’ like their then *DR Congo, Angola, Mozambique, Cuba, Central Africa republic (C.A.R), Libya, some of their Bantuses in West Africa, their middle Eastern backyard like; Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries>>>>

      repondre message

      • 25 March 18:45, by Langbaar

        in South America, some parts of Asia and some of their Eastern Europe during their so-called *COLD WAR*. And the vermin think, South Sudan would be re-united with their cloned so-called Arabs of North Sudan just like their then ’East and West Germany’. And the vermin who desperately covet our country and our people to death would then go and lie through their usual death as usual that their>>>>>

        repondre message

        • 25 March 20:07, by Langbaar

          in South America, some parts of Asia and some of their Eastern Europe during their so-called *COLD WAR*. And the vermin think, South Sudan would be re-united with their cloned so-called Arabs of North Sudan just like their then ’East and West Germany’. And the vermin who desperately covet our country and our people to death would then go and lie through their usual death as usual that their>>>>>

          repondre message

          • 26 March 08:48, by Fathi

            Kuch aka Pakuai so-called Langbaar,

            We have almost about 30 million in gold smuggled out of sudan every day or every other day. Catch some smugglers or get some investors in the gold industry and we’ll be fine.

            Currently, a barrel of crude oil is about $24 lol.

            repondre message

            • 26 March 08:50, by Fathi

              " The Parasites have attached themselves like ’leeches or ticks’ to our country and our people"

              LOL get outta here with that nonsense. Sudan decided to accept all the national debt instead of dividing it, which is why South Sudan started off 0 debt.

              repondre message

              • 26 March 08:55, by Fathi

                "And the vermin think, South Sudan would be re-united with their cloned so-called Arabs of North Sudan just like their then ’East and West Germany"

                lol.. honestly at this point we’re nowhere close to a reunification, even if we both actually wanted it. We both have our own major internal problems to workout and reunification wouldn’t solve those problems.

                repondre message

                • 26 March 09:06, by Fathi

                  I’m starting to find idea of reunification, especially at this moment, to be a futile thought. We should focus on being good neighbors, end the proxy wars between us, and engage in mutually beneficial development projects.

                  repondre message

                  • 26 March 09:17, by Fathi

                    Also, I don’t see why you’re so concerned with the west trying to reunify Sudan and South Sudan. Uniting African countries goes against their agenda. Also, they can’t force us to unite. Sudanese and South Sudanese would have to agree to that as a prerequisite in order for that to happen.

                    repondre message

  • 26 March 09:27, by Fathi

    "Trump administration, following calls of the victims and their families, says it will not remove Sudan from the blacklist of terror states unless Khartoum pays compensations to the victims."

    repondre message

    • 26 March 09:32, by Fathi

      Let’s be honest, the Trump administration doesn’t give a damn about calls of the victims and their families. If he cared about victims, then 9/11 victims and first responders wouldn’t have to beg for money to be placed in the victim’s fund so they can cover medical expenses.

      repondre message

      • 26 March 09:34, by Fathi

        The US could’ve easily passed a law that would’ve held Saudi Arabia responsible for 9/11. We all know the difference is that Saudi Arabia has the money to legally bribe US politicians so that it won’t be held accountable.

        repondre message

        • 26 March 09:38, by Fathi

          My question is why isn’t Afghanistan held accountable? Why was Afghanistan not on the SST list? These attacks happened in 2000 off the coast of Yemen. Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda had been deported from Sudan and were chilling in Afghanistan since 1996. This was political trial. The US is incapable of being impartial.

          repondre message

          • 26 March 09:41, by Fathi

            Why is it that only countries on the state sponsors of terrorism list can be held accountable? Shouldn’t any country sponsoring terrorism be held accountable?

            repondre message

            • 26 March 09:51, by Fathi

              Why did it take until December 2019 for the US to pass a law to prohibit using tax $ to knowingly provide weapons or any other form of support to Al Qaeda, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Jabhat Fateh al Sham, Hamas, Hizballah, Palestine Islamic Jihad, al-Shabaab, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

              repondre message

              • 26 March 09:53, by Fathi

                US Senator Tulsi Gabbard said "Unfortunately, in their dogged pursuit of regime change war, leaders in Washington have used taxpayer dollars to fund programs that directly and indirectly support terrorist groups like al-Qaeda in places like Syria.

                repondre message

                • 26 March 09:53, by Fathi

                  This continues in Yemen where US-support for Saudi Arabia’s genocidal war in Yemen has resulted in the Saudis delivering US-weapons to terrorist groups like al-Qaeda, as reported by CNN earlier this year."

                  repondre message

                  • 26 March 09:55, by Fathi

                    If that was Sudan doing that, these guys in Washington would’ve fined Sudan a trillion dollars.

                    As you can see, the US continues with their policy "do as I say, not what I do."

                    repondre message

                    • 26 March 09:57, by Fathi

                      To be honest, I’m surprised the US didn’t try to blame their false flag attack of 9/11 on Sudan. They’ll probably do it in the future.

                      repondre message

  • 26 March 09:58, by Fathi

    "Trump administration, following calls of the victims and their families, says it will not remove Sudan from the blacklist of terror states unless Khartoum pays compensations to the victims."

    repondre message

    • 26 March 10:01, by Fathi

      I’m sure the trump administration has received more calls to remove Sudan off the terrorist list. This has nothing to do with calls/pressure. It has everything to do with Saudi & UAE paying $ to dictate US foreign policy toward Sudan.

      repondre message

  • 26 March 10:05, by Fathi

    I hesitate to vote for a democrat over Trump because the democrats have just as shitty of a foreign policy toward Sudan. We all remember pervy Bill and his al-shifa strikes. Also establishment Joe aka sleepy Joe Biden has dementia so he’ll likely appoint the antichrist, Susan Rice, who will likely continue to shit on Sudan.

    repondre message

    • 26 March 10:08, by Fathi

      Even though I’ve enjoyed laughing at Trump’s statements for the past couple of years, I’ll have to go corrupt Dems instead of MBS & MBZ running Sudan.

      repondre message

      • 26 March 16:38, by Eastern

        Fathi,
        It was a bitter split - South Sudan did not carry any piece of the oil pipeline. Why should it carry the debt burden when the same was incurred in the futile effort to exterminate southern Sudanese. Blame Omar Bashir for lying to you Sudanese for more than 3 decades under the guise of religion....

        repondre message

        • 27 March 02:18, by Fathi

          Eastern,

          South Sudan didn’t carry any piece of the oil pipeline but carried 75-80% of the oil. The multibillion dollar pipeline is useless without the oil lol.

          repondre message

          • 27 March 02:28, by Fathi

            They should carry some of the debt because some of that debt came from education, healthcare, or infrastructure spent on the south. Bashir was a dictator that came to power by military coup. We had no say on his policies. Let’s clear, anyone who voiced opposition to him was tortured, shot, or killed. We didn’t have the right to protest, freedom of press, or religion.

            repondre message

            • 27 March 02:36, by Fathi

              I wouldn’t characterize it as an attempt to exterminate South Sudanese only because many in the north also died. Don’t forget over half a million northerners died in our civil wars. Moreover, the SPLM engaged in gorilla warfare, which ultimately led to SAF indiscriminate air strikes on the South. This resulted in many civilian deaths in South Sudan.

              repondre message

              • 27 March 02:39, by Fathi

                Also, many in the north joined the struggle with south. This includes blue nile, south kordofan, and Darfur. Many of them have lost their lives. If it wasn’t for them, many would argue that south sudan wouldn’t have gained independence. By taking all the debt, they too are carrying the burden of that debt.

                repondre message

                • 27 March 02:49, by Fathi

                  South Sudanese fought for legitimate reasons. I place blame on racists, religious zealots of the north and the political elites who failed to establish a representative democracy and distribute wealth in a just manner. My issue is with the north taking all the debt.

                  repondre message

            • 27 March 05:57, by Eastern

              Fathi,

              Did you just say "we did not have the right to protest...?" Lol..southern Sudanese used the gun to protest. Continue crying over spilled milk, dude
              ..

              repondre message

              • 27 March 07:33, by Fathi

                Using the gun to protest resulted in millions of Sudanese + South Sudanese deaths.
                I’m not crying over spilled milk. I only brought up the debt because langbaar called Sudanese parasitic over oil proceeds but ok

                repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


How we should look at the relationship between the two Sudans 2020-04-04 08:28:35 I dedicate this contribution to martyrs and friends, and especially to our leader Dr John Garang De Mabior, Yousif Kuwa Mekki, Mohamed Juma Nail, Hashim Abubakr, Mohamed Ahmed Omar Al Haboub, (...)

Of Peacekeepers and Pandemics 2020-04-03 07:43:49 By Jean-Pierre Lacroix The COVID-19 pandemic is also developing in countries marred by armed conflict. In an op-ed featured in Le Monde, the head of United Nations Peacekeeping, Jean-Pierre (...)

Can South Sudan parties fulfil army’s reunification 2020-04-01 09:13:05 By Tor Madira Machier Following the formation of South Sudan’s Revitalized Transitional Government of National Unity (R-TGoNU) last month, scepticism has remained as to whether the South Sudan (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2020 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.