Thursday, August 15, 2024

Sudan Tribune

Plural news and views on Sudan

Dangers of SPLM debate on presidential candidature

Isaiah Abraham

September 12, 2009 — The Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (The SPLM) has ran into trouble as to who should go to contest against President Omar Hassan Ahmed Al Bashir of the National Congress Party (NCP) in the slated April next year general elections. The troubles as we all read from earlier this year has so much to do with theories and conspiracies other than an election per se. But the SPLM in its open and underground meetings and consultations failed to agree on the way forward- who should go as a party torch bearer. No wonder the party has struggled in vain to accommodate different options to bail itself out of the crisis, until it shifted to the media and here we are being left with public guesses, one of which Mr. Malk Aggar of the Blue State has featured and claimed to be a compromise candidate. I don’t know however how could that be done with ease.

Before we argued further on the consequences of this plan, let it be known categorically here that the scheme under which Mr. Kiir is reported to have declined to nominate himself or refuse to relinquish his Chairmanship role to his deputy, is a typical plot by certain section of society or certain community to play a hocus-pocus game against certain individual they think isn’t ‘proper’ to take over the mantra of leadership for the Southern Sudan, when don’t work out in Khartoum contest. In another word, these people have hatched this project to block the rising candidature of the current Vice President in both seats. Chairman Kiir purported stand has a lot to be desired and simply too loaded. But again, what do you think would be in the mind of Dr. Machar supporters when this man is treated like that again, do you remember Nyakuron last year? On Malik project, why would anyone settle for a junior and literally amateur, leaving the capable behind? What also do you read has been going on behind the scene in all that package of theories?

But also wasn’t the SPLM party fighting for that objective for the past 20 or so year- the new Sudan vision? By the way, what will the people of the Sudan say about us, especially the party and its Chair? Why would anyone run away from constitutional challenges, at its peak leaving the public in disarray? Please spare the people of Southern Sudan and the Sudan such a rubbish. His visit to Darfur, Nuba Mountains and Ingessina Hills capture the mood of the electorates, that they are yearning for change, why abundant them in the middle of the road? Isn’t this not Mr. Kiir who had confessed that he has been dealing (fighting) with the separatists in the South to realize the New Sudan of equality, unity and progress? Back home, it has even becomes an issues right now everywhere that the man people have pegged their hope in him has abdicated his duties just to settle score with his competitor.

We don’t need another split at an eleven hour. We madly killed other for nothing and it should be a bitter lesson not to repeat. The SPLM Chairman must not let himself to be deceived that everything will be normal if he goes against the grain to short changed Dr. Machar today or tomorrow. The business will not be the same and the enemy in Khartoum will capitalise on each of us. There is nothing special in the Southern Presidency that couldn’t be realised if we remain strategically focused. If the Chairman shies from losing, then he isn’t a politician but an opportunist; he must not assume to ride on others back or achievement. Who says politics is a smooth path; you mess it up, you pay for it.

A clever ruse to protect the SPLM Chairman at this stage is dangerous. If Gen. Kiir lacks confidence how dare are we to keep him in the Southern Presidency? If fact it was a mistake to give him that position in Kamotho, the Chairmanship shouldn’t have been given to him in the first place. He has proven beyond any reasonable doubts that we had hoped against any hope for him and nothing will change even if we allowed him ten more years. That anomaly should be corrected and the time for it is here. A great opportunity!

Someone has argued here, as others do elsewhere, that since its his democratic right to refuse, he should be left alone. Until this become official, I strongly feel that the SPLM party must sit down now and iron it out; they got to follow party laws letter by letter. Amendment or accommodation with clouded theory hanging over this matter at the moment won’t help, but complicate things. The mistake of May last year must be avoided. It was a bad experience when few figures were responsible to call the shot As the election approaches, the party ought to be conscious of how will their plan look like in the end.

Gen. Kiir isn’t popular anymore due to disillusions that have gripped our people ranging from smallest thing to the biggest. We are at a lost! Malpractices and bad governance have become his middle names. He has run out of steam to move our nation to work, and fight external and internal challenges more effectively. We have been saying those lines over and over again, yeah? ‘Darwish’ won’t like this piece, but the reality calls for sobriety before its too late. He’s too much a burden. Throw out then Gen. Kiir project quickly, if we want to have unified party next year and during Referendum time; allow Gen. Kiir to retire and if he is serious he should try it against Al Bashir or leave the situation the way its now. We will see what will happen when the enemy flag goes down in our land in 9 months time.

As for Malik as a person, besides his dingy and freaky character, there is no any point to disturb the current structures of the party. The attempt to overstepped hard working individuals when they are in their prime stages of leadership, can’t be received with a flower. Troubles can’t just be created at day break because someone has been driven by a whim that they are always leaders to rule and if not them, then to hell or ‘balash’. We had enough of bitter problems from tribal generating problems and no one should drag us there. After all pacifying them (Nuba and Funj people) is too late thing too little.

In summation, the case of what to do with Mr. Kiir- should the rumor of him refusing to nominate himself as SPLM Presidential candidate be proven- must not be allowed to interfere with the structures and institutions. This is a national seat not a community monopoly to intimidate others or engineer acts of stopping others from anscending to power. If Gen. Kiir refuses why didn’t he officially nominated his deputy to take over, why a Northerner? But in the first place, why keep the matter secret at this time but engage in clandestine media propaganda? In the upcoming party Convention therefore, the party is urged to put this divisive matter to rest once and for all. God may you bless us in this Holy Month of Ramadhan!

Isaiah Abraham lives in Juba; he can be reached on [email protected]

16 Comments

  • Michael Madit Magot
    Michael Madit Magot

    Dangers of SPLM debate on presidential candidature
    Professor Isaiah,

    Very educative article! I support president Kiir for refusing to be nominated for the Sudan presidency seat.
    He should not relinguish his seat to Gar Dr Machar Teny like that. A man who has not toil for the southerners.

    Besides, iam backing the idea that Malik Agar be nominated to run against Bashir while Kiir must be allowed to retain his powers as the president of the south.
    That way we the D..ka will retain the power.isn’t it good

    Reply
  • Akol Liai Mager
    Akol Liai Mager

    Dangers of SPLM debate on presidential candidature
    Dear Isaiah,

    This article contains dangerous elements that are not good for Riek Machar and SPLM alike. I wouldn’t have comment if not this two part question you asked I quote; “If Gen. Kiir refuses why didn’t he officially nominated his deputy to take over, why a northerner?

    My brother Isaiah, the most dangerous element in your article is that quoted question’ especially the last part ‘why a norhterner?’

    I thought you know that SPLM means SPLM and not South Sudan party. SPLM is a national party where citizens from the East, West, North, South and Centre have rights to serve in any position including rights to get nominated as party candidates for any position being a Prime Ministership or President of Sudan.

    You outlined your reasons for expressing anger about Malik Agar being nominated as SPLM presidential candidate in the expenses of Riek Machar and that’s your universal right to do so. However, I suspected Riek himself might be one of the people favoured the nomination of Malik Agar, unless he disassociate himself from this otherwise.

    If Riek Machar believed in the Vision of New Sudan, its principles and direction of which I have no doubt about his strong believe, then there is no doubt that he share the good idea of nominating Malik Agar as SPLM presidential candidate.

    The reason I am saying is that, SPLM cares more about how best Sudan should be ruled not who should rule Sudan or South.

    Western democracies are strong because they elect an inclusive leaders who have not only a good education, but who actually embraces the public opinion and capable of defeating an opponent parties’ candidates.

    The most popular and acceptable across lines is what SPLM needs to come up with and I think SPLM leadership is not driven by external forces.

    Do not harm Riek Machar please.

    Reply
  • Gatwech
    Gatwech

    Dangers of SPLM debate on presidential candidature
    Professor Isaiah Abraham,

    Excellent article! You are a true man with a loving heart for the betterment of the people of South Sudan and Sudan in general.

    Yes, I agree with you that Salva Kiir as the chairman of the SPLM should contest against Omer el Bashir. What is all the noise about the New Sudan if people now fear to face the giant.

    Or if he doesn’t want to contest, he should understandably step down and handover the chairmanship to Dr. Machar who is the next person in the hierarchy.

    Refusing to contest and at the same time refusing to handover chairmanship puts the party in a potential danger of failure. International experience tells that a chairman is the one competing against other chairmen of different political parties. Why fear?

    To bring a junior member from the leadership without the necessary party powers and dumped to contest in Khartoum against Beshir is questionable and an indication that the SPLM as a political party is not serious about the elections.

    Let us hope that God will speak to Salva Kiir to choose between the two: Accepting to contest against Beshir or stepping down and giving the powers to Dr. Riek Machar as chairman of the party. Any third option is not safe!

    Reply
  • saif El hag
    saif El hag

    Dangers of SPLM debate on presidential candidature
    I invite SPLM to consider including Dr Tabita Shokai in the debate to run for presidency against Mr el Bashir. If we scrutinize all SPLM we will find Dr Tabita is one of the cleanest offical, no corruption heard of. She can be a fair leader. Give a chance to a lady to lead the Sudan. All men who have led the Sudan have never satisfied the sudanese peoples aspirations. So let us rally behind Dr Tabita Butrus Shokai.

    Saif El Hag

    Reply
  • Johnny
    Johnny

    Dangers of SPLM debate on presidential candidature
    Isaiah, wen da aguec, t? moor eno, ci t? e caric guece-thar by dinka man.

    u guy? will nowhere…

    Reply
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *